Kevin Fernandez Vs. State of Nevada, et al.

Filing 660

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 610 entered on 03/01/2012, is adopted and accepted, and Defendants' Motion to Enforce Settlement 577 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Enforcement of the Settlement Agreement 564 is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 8/10/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

*****

9
10
11
12
13

KEVIN FERNANDEZ,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_____________________________________ )

3:06-cv-00628-LRH-WGC
O RDER

14
15

Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G.

16

Cobb (#6101 ) entered on March 1, 2012, recommending granting Defendants’ Motion to Enforce

17

Settlement (#577) filed on November 10, 2012, and denying Plaintiff's Motion to Compel

18

Enforcement of the Settlement Agreement (#564) filed on November 22, 2011. Plaintiff filed his

19

Objection to Magistrate ‘s Report and Recommendation (#625) on March 26, 2012, and Defendants

20

filed their Response to Plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation on April 4,

21

2012 (#634).

22

Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation and Motion for Review of Order (#637) on April 12, 2012.

23

This matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 1B

24

1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

Plaintiff then filed his Reply to Defendants’ Response to Plaintiff’s Objections to

25
26

1

Refers to court’s docket number.

1

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of

2

the Plaintiff, the response of the Defendants, the Reply of Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of

3

the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Rule

4

IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#610) entered

5

on March 1, 2012, should be adopted and accepted.

6

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation

7

(#610) entered on March 1, 2012, is adopted and accepted, and Defendants’ Motion to Enforce

8

Settlement (#577) is GRANTED.

9

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Enforcement of the Settlement

10

Agreement (#564) is DENIED.

11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12

DATED this 10th day of August, 2012.

13
14
15
16

_______________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

2