Egberto v. Nevada Department Of Corrections

Filing 124

ORDER. The Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's 55 Report and Recommendation. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's 35 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. (See Order for specifcs) FURT HER ORDERED that defendants' 64 Motion for Enlargement of Time; 65 Motion for Leave to File In Camera Submission of Medical Records; and, 71 Motion to Strike are GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall STRIK E Docket Entries 67 68 69 and 70 . FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' [64-2] Motion for Reconsideration of U.S. Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's 119 Reconsideration of plaintiff Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/04/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)

Download PDF
' d I .. + . ' Jk ) 1 C.;.url D ) i .. uç ) E 1f j .. . - r ' r( ' .';.(y:a; :) . M . '. .i I y ( g '. ' .. w : ',I ''r ) .(;, . v -' ' ; rct,f v; .. u- y, îL . . , 1 : j i 4 j ' t 2 3 4 , l . l ! , . j J ' ïV 0 t è. . . o/y j mrt ! tl ta ' . . ' ' . .j '? k 'j . . ' ., r ,, t .. ' .? s J, .- ; u4 , 1 Ck. t .. g ) 1 . ' C':T . ' 3 JN ç ry h. 5 6 U N I ED STA T ES DI T R I T C O U R T T SC 7 8 DI TR I T O F NEVADA SC 9 RI KEY EGBERTO, C 1 0 11 Case No.3:6- V- 15- CJ( AM) :OC 7 R R O R D ER Pl i tf, a n if 1 NEVA DA DEPARTM E NT O F 2 C O R R E C TI N S . etaI, O S . 13 D ef ndant . e s 1 4 1 5 Bef r t e Courf rconsierton i t e Repor andRecommendatons( 55)ofU. . oe h to d ai s h t i# S 1 Magi tat Judge Rober A. co uai , .ent r d May 27, 6 sr e tM d Jr, e e 2008.Thi acton wasr f red t si eer o 1 U. . gita eJ d e Rob dA. ou i , r, r u n t 28U, . , 6 6( )1 ( )an LR 7 S Ma srt u g e Mc ad J ,pu s a t o S C j 3 b ( )B d l I 1 4,OnJ n 1 , 008, f n an sfld a Mo inf rEnlr eme to Ti e( 6 )i whc 8 Bu e 92 Dee d t i e t o a g n f m # 4 n ih o 1 t fe t ei obe t n t te Rep r an Rec mme d to s a d a t c e E hbt(/ 4 2) 9 o i h r jci s o h l o ot d o n a in , n ta h d x ii /6 20 Moton f r Reconsi er ton of U. . Magitat Judge' Repor and Rec m mendaton. io d ai S sr e s t o i 21 Def ndant alo submit d a Seal d M oton f r l Cam er Subm isi n ofMedi alRecor s e ss te e ion a so c d 2 ( 65) 2# . 2 3 Alo b f r t e Co r i De enda t 'Mo in t Stie ( 7 )fld on J l 7,20 8, s eo e h u t s f ns t o r # 1 i o k e uy 0 24 r questng t att e Cour stie t e f l w i g pl adi gs fld on behal oft e Pl i tf by hi e ihh t rk h o l n e n i o e f h a n if s 25 wi Nat leSmi Egbero,PlitfsObectonst MotonsfldW hi Casei Styed( 68) f ai t e h t an ir j i o i i e l e sa # , 26 Mot nt Per iL t Fin o Plitf Obecin i Padt Ma itaeJ dg ' Re oran i o m t a e l g f an i' j t s n o i fs o o g sr t u es p t d 2 // 7/ 28 // / l Recommendatonsdue t Ex usabl Neglct( 67)and Pl itf sRespons t Def ndant' i oc e e# an ir eo e s 2 Moton f r Reconsi er ton ofU. .Magitat Judge' Repod and Recommendaton and io d ai S sr e s i 3 Plitf' Obecinst Magitat Judge' Repor and Recommendatons( 69/ 0)fld on a nifs j to o sr e s t i # 7 ie 4 June 24, 2008. 5 Al o bef r t e Cour i Pl i tf s Reconsi er ton o Pl i tf M oton f rPr lm i ar s oe h t s a n ir d a i f a n if i o e i n y 6 lj ncin ( 119)fld Sept mber1 ,2009. nu to # i e e 5 7 8 A. 1 A NA LY SI . S Revi w ofM agi t at Judge' O r er e sr e sd 9 Anyparymayobec t amagitat j dge' cas diposiiepr posedor erfndigs, t j to sr e u s e s tv o d ,i n 1 orr c mmendatons.28 U. . .j 636( )1)B) Fed. , i. .72( ) LR 74..The ditit 0 eo i SC b( ( ' , R C vP b ; 2 src l cour mustmak a de nov det r iaton oftose podinsoft e magitat j dge' r por 1 t e o em n i h o h sr e u s e t 1 t whihobectoni madeandmayac ept rjct ormodiy,i whol ori par,hefndigs 2o c jis c ,ee , fn e n tt i n l o r c mmen a in mad b te mags rt jdg .!a Deno or ve me n t ec u t s 3 re o d t s e yh o ita e u e # v e iw a s h o r mu t 1 consi ert e materanew, he same as i i had notbeen hear bef r and as i no decii n 4 dh t t ft d oe f so 1 pr viusl had beenr nder d.Nessv. 5 eo y ee Commisiner954 F.d 1 95,1 97 (t Ci.1 92) so , 24 4 9h r 9 . 1 Thus,alho ugh t e di ti tc ur need nothol a de novo hearng, he c ur' oblgaton i t 6 t h s rc o t d it ot s i i so 1 arie atis own idependentconclsi n aboutt ose pori ns oft e magitat jdge' 7 rv t n uo h to h sr e u s 1 fndigs orr commendaton t whih obj ci ns ar made. Unied St t sv,Remsnn,874 8in e i o c e to e t ae i 1 F.d 614,617 ( t Ci.1989) 92 9h r . 2 0 Aferconductng a de nov r vi w oft e r c r ,t e Cour ac ept and adopt t e t i oee h e od h tc s sh 21 Magitat Judge' Recommendaton(/ 5) sr e s i /5 . 22 jj c onc usi n j lo 2 3 25 I I HEREBY ORDERED t a Plitf Mot n f rPr l iar Ij n t n ( 35)i TS h t a ni' fs i o e i n y nu ci # s o m o 1, 24 G R A NT E D i par and DEN I D i par as f l w s: nt E n t ol o A pr lmiar ij nctonor erngDef ndanst f l w DrLong' r commended ei n y nu i d i e t o ol o. se 2 cour e ofteat entoror erng Def ndant t send Pl i t# f ranot ereval aton by an 6 s rm di e so an i o h ui 27 equi al nt doc or and t en f l w i g t at doct rs r com m ended cour e of teat ent i ve t h oi n h o o' e s rm s 28 G RA NTED. 2. A pr l iar ij ncton tansfrig Plitf t anot erfciiyi DENI D, ei n y nu i r e rn a nifo m h a lt s E I I FURTHER ORDERED tatDeend ns Mo in f rEnlr eme to Ti e ( 6 ) TS h f a t to o ag n f m / 4, / Moton f rLeave t fl l Camer SubmisinofMedialRec r s ( 65) and Def ndant' io oi n e a so c od # , e s Motont Stie( 71)ar GRANTED. i o rk # e I I FURTHER O RDERED t att e Cl r oft e Cour shal STRI E Dock tEntis TS h h ek h t l K e re (/ 7)( 68)(/ 9)& ( 70)fom t e Cour' r c r . /6 # /6 #rh t e od s I I FU RT H E R O R D ER ED t at Def ndant 'M ot n f r R econsi er ton of U. . TS h e s io o d ai S 9 Magitat Judge' Repor and Rec mmendaton(/ 4- )i DENI D. sr e s t o i /6 2 s E I I FURTH ER O R D E R E D t at Pl i tf' Rec nsi er to n of Pl i tf M oton f r TS h a n if s o d ai a n if io 1 0 Pr lmiar lj ncin ( 119)i DENI D. ei n y nu to # s E I I SO O R D ER E D . TS DA T ED :Thi s day ofNovem ber 2009. , o er . one t U N I E D STAT T DI T R I T JU DG E SC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?