Bynoe v. Helling et al

Filing 133

ORDERED that respondents unopposed fourth motion for extension of time to file a response to the motion for evidentiary hearing (ECF No. 132 ) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. The deadline to respond to ECF No. 121 Motion is extended to April 3, 2023. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents unopposed second motion for extension of time to file a reply in support of their motion to dismiss (ECF No. 130) is GRANTED. The deadline to reply re ECF No. 114 Motion is extended to May 1, 2023. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/3/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
Case 3:07-cv-00009-LRH-CLB Document 133 Filed 04/03/23 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 11 12 13 Order Granting Extensions of Time to File Response to Motion for Evidentiary Hearing and to File Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Petitioner, v. PERRY RUSSELL, WARDEN, et al., (ECF Nos. 130, 132) Respondents. 14 15 *** Case No. 3:07-cv-00009-LRH-CLB MICHAEL BRUCE BYNOE, Respondents ask the court for extensions of time to respond to § 2254 habeas 16 corpus petitioner Michael Bruce Bynoe’s motion for evidentiary hearing and to file a 17 reply in support of their motion to dismiss. (ECF Nos. 130, 132.) Good cause appearing, 18 IT IS ORDERED that respondents’ unopposed fourth motion for extension of time 19 to file a response to the motion for evidentiary hearing (ECF No. 132) is GRANTED 20 nunc pro tunc. The deadline to respond is extended to April 3, 2023. 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents’ unopposed second motion for 22 extension of time to file a reply in support of their motion to dismiss (ECF No. 130) is 23 GRANTED. The deadline to reply is extended to May 1, 2023. 24 DATED: April 3, 2023. 25 26 LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?