Bynoe v. Helling et al
Filing
133
ORDERED that respondents unopposed fourth motion for extension of time to file a response to the motion for evidentiary hearing (ECF No. 132 ) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. The deadline to respond to ECF No. 121 Motion is extended to April 3, 2023. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents unopposed second motion for extension of time to file a reply in support of their motion to dismiss (ECF No. 130) is GRANTED. The deadline to reply re ECF No. 114 Motion is extended to May 1, 2023. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/3/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
Case 3:07-cv-00009-LRH-CLB Document 133 Filed 04/03/23 Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
11
12
13
Order Granting Extensions of Time to
File Response to Motion for
Evidentiary Hearing and to File Reply
in Support of Motion to Dismiss
Petitioner,
v.
PERRY RUSSELL, WARDEN, et al.,
(ECF Nos. 130, 132)
Respondents.
14
15
***
Case No. 3:07-cv-00009-LRH-CLB
MICHAEL BRUCE BYNOE,
Respondents ask the court for extensions of time to respond to § 2254 habeas
16
corpus petitioner Michael Bruce Bynoe’s motion for evidentiary hearing and to file a
17
reply in support of their motion to dismiss. (ECF Nos. 130, 132.) Good cause appearing,
18
IT IS ORDERED that respondents’ unopposed fourth motion for extension of time
19
to file a response to the motion for evidentiary hearing (ECF No. 132) is GRANTED
20
nunc pro tunc. The deadline to respond is extended to April 3, 2023.
21
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents’ unopposed second motion for
22
extension of time to file a reply in support of their motion to dismiss (ECF No. 130) is
23
GRANTED. The deadline to reply is extended to May 1, 2023.
24
DATED: April 3, 2023.
25
26
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?