Bynoe v. Helling et al

Filing 79

ORDERED that petitioner has 30 days (5/19/2021) from the date of this order to file a motion for stay, if any. Respondents may file a response and petitioner may reply as per the normal briefing schedule under the local rules. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner fails to respond to this order the petition may be dismissed. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/19/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 8 9 10 11 12 MICHAEL BRUCE BYNOE, v. Case No. 3:07-cv-00009-LRH Petitioner, ORDER HELLING, et al., Respondents. On September 23, 2009, this court dismissed petitioner Michael Bruce Bynoe’s 13 first-amended § 2254 habeas petition without prejudice because all grounds were 14 unexhausted (ECF No. 41). The court denied Bynoe’s motion to stay. Id. Judgment was 15 entered (ECF No. 42). Seven years later, on September 14, 2016, petitioner filed a 16 motion for relief from final judgment and to reopen the case (ECF No. 52). 17 At the time the court dismissed Bynoe’s petition as wholly unexhausted, a 18 petition containing only unexhausted claims was not eligible for the stay and abey 19 procedure outlined in Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005) ECF No. 41). In February 20 2016, the Ninth Circuit held in Mena v. Long that the Rhines stay-and-abey procedure is 21 not limited to mixed petitions and held that a district court may exercise its discretion to 22 stay a petition that raises only unexhausted claims. 813 F.3d at 912. In September 23 2016, Bynoe filed a motion for relief from judgment in light of the Mena decision (ECF 24 No. 52). This court concluded that Bynoe failed to demonstrate that extraordinary 25 circumstances warranted relief from judgment and denied the motion (ECF No. 65). 26 Bynoe appealed, and in July 2020, the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded (see 27 ECF No. 74). The court of appeals directed that on remand Bynoe may request that this 28 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 court stay his petition under Rhines and Mena while he returns to state court to exhaust his federal constitutional claims. Accordingly, Bynoe has 30 days to file a motion for stay and abeyance. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner has 30 days from the date of this order to file a motion for stay, if any. Respondents may file a response and petitioner may reply as per the normal briefing schedule under the local rules. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner fails to respond to this order the petition may be dismissed. 10 11 DATED this 19th day of April, 2021. 12 LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?