Stroup v. Bishop et al

Filing 67

ORDER accepting 64 Report and Recommendations : ORDERED Ds' 60 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. FURTHER ORD that P's 65 Objections is DENIED. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Brian E. Sandoval on 1/6/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

.

*

FL L E t) /TEI I t FE j '

.

z rE.: ,rgy'jj p , ) lj.)i .- $.g 's à, J t

S I, !?.;( grF(:r) ûJ$E.)F !s k( k 1 î ;:

2
3 4 5

)
r ' .'
.' .

! - r -( gg ; I ; gg ;
t - - - .- - . :, !
-

( 7' pï?.t y j V 7 7 s jr
1' J

--

.

f ' )$ - 1' '''rL'

- i' 7 '/ f - - u - .-- a . ..- = = z-= = :. 7. '7 . - -. . u .-

6 7

UNI ED STATES DI TR I T CO URT T SC DI TRI T OF NEVADA SC

8 BOBBY JEHU STROUP,

9

Pl itf ani, f

1 0 v . 1 T. SHO P, a . 1 BI et I, 1 2 Def ndant . e s
13

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

3:7- V- 9- ES- PC 0C 9B V

ORDER

1 4

Bef r t eCouri d f n a t' tonF r u m ar J dgm en ( 60) Thi a t nwas oe h ts e e d n s Mo i o s m y u t# . s c i o

1 r f redt U. . gita eJu g Valr P. ok pu su n t 28 U. . . 63 ( )1 ( )a d 5 e e r o S Ma sr t d e e i Co e r a t o e S C j 6 b ( )B n 1 LR I 1 4. Th Magita e Ju g s bm ie h rRepod and Re om m en a i n ( 6 )on 6 Be srt d e u t d e t c d to # 4
1 Nov m ber1 , 7 e 4 2008, ecom m endi gt at hi Cour ent ran or ergr ntng def ndant ' i n r n h ts te d ai e s Moto

1 f r Summar J dg en . Pl itf fld hi Obeci n t Ma ita e J d e' Repod an 8o y u m t an if i e s j t s o g sr t u g s o d
1 Recommendaton ( oc #65)on December11,2008 and def ndant fld a Response t 9 iD e si e o 2 Plit f Obec int Ma ita e J d e' Rep d and Rec m m en a in ( 6 )on Dec mber 0 an i ' j t o g sr t u g s o fs o o d to # 6 e
21 26,2008.

22
23 A.

1 ANALYSI . S
Revi w ofM agi t at Judge' O r er e sr e sd

2 4

Anyp dymayobec t amagita ej dge' c s dipo iv pr p s dor erfn igs a j to s r t u s a e s st e o o e d ,id n , i

2 orr c m m en a i n . 28 U. . .j 63 ( )1 ( ) Fe . . i. .72( ) L 74. . e ditit 5 eo d to s SC 6 b ( )B ' d R C V P , b ' R 2 Th s r , c 2 c ur mu tmak a de nov de er ia in o t o e p din o t e ma ita e j dg ' r p r 6 ot s e o t m n to f h s o o s f h g s rt u es e o t

2 t whihobec in i mad an maya c pt rj c, modi ,nwh l ori p d,h f digs 7 o c jt s e d o c e ,e e t or f i oe n a te i n y n
2 or ec m menda i n mad b t e magitat j d e.J= De n v r vew mean t ec udmus 8 ro t s e yh o sr e u g J . o o e i sh o t

1

1 consi ert e m at er anew ,t e sam e as i i had notbeen hear bef r and as i no deci i n dh t h ft d oe f so

2 pr vou l h d b en r n er d.Ne sv. e i sy a e e d e s Commisin r 95 F. d 1 95,1 97 ( t Ci. 99 ) s o e, 4 2 4 4 9h r1 2 .
3 Thus,al ough t e dititcour need nothol a de novo hearng,t e cour' obl aton i t t h h s rc t d ih t s i i so g

4 arie ati own ide en en c ncu in abou t o e p di n o t e magitat j d e' r v t s n p d t o lso th s o o s f h sr e u g s 5 fn igsorr c m men a i nt whih o j c insar made. Uni d St t sv.Remsiq,87 id n eo d t o c be t o o e t e ae n 4 6 F.d 61 , 7 ( t Ci.1 8 ) 2 4 61 9 h r 9 9 . 7 Afer nducig ade n v r vew o t e p ri n of h r c r obecedt b plit f t co tn o o e i f h o t s t e e o d j t o y an i , o f
8 t e Cour ac ep si wh l t e Magitae Ju g ' r c m m end t nsan fn igs( 6 ) h t c t n oe h srt d es e o ai o d id n # 4 .
9
l0

II C o Ncu sl s I uo

I I HEREBY ORDERED t atdef ndant 'Moton f rSum mar Judgment( 60)i TS h e s io y #s
G RA NTED

11

1 2

l 3

I I FURTHER ORDEREDt a plitfsObec in t Ma ita eJu g ' Reporan TS h t a n i' j t s o gs r t d e s f o td

1 Rec m menda i n( 65)i DENI D,Th Clr of h Coud s alen eru gm en ac or igy 4 o t#s o E e e k te h l t jd t c d n l.
1 5 1 6
1 7
18 19
20

I I SO O RD ER ED . TS DATED:Thi 6T day ofJanuar , 2009. sH y

21
22

UNI E D STATES DI TR I T JUDG E T SC

23
24 25

26
27

28

2