Stroup v. Bishop et al

Filing 67

ORDER accepting 64 Report and Recommendations : ORDERED Ds' 60 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. FURTHER ORD that P's 65 Objections is DENIED. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Brian E. Sandoval on 1/6/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
. * FL L E t) /TEI I t FE j ' . z rE.: ,rgy'jj p , ) lj.)i .- $.g 's à, J t S I, !?.;( grF(:r) ûJ$E.)F !s k( k 1 î ;: 2 3 4 5 ) r ' .' .' . ! - r -( gg ; I ; gg ; t - - - .- - . :, ! - ( 7' pï?.t y j V 7 7 s jr 1' J -- . f ' )$ - 1' '''rL' - i' 7 '/ f - - u - .-- a . ..- = = z-= = :. 7. '7 . - -. . u .- 6 7 UNI ED STATES DI TR I T CO URT T SC DI TRI T OF NEVADA SC 8 BOBBY JEHU STROUP, 9 Pl itf ani, f 1 0 v . 1 T. SHO P, a . 1 BI et I, 1 2 Def ndant . e s 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 3:7- V- 9- ES- PC 0C 9B V ORDER 1 4 Bef r t eCouri d f n a t' tonF r u m ar J dgm en ( 60) Thi a t nwas oe h ts e e d n s Mo i o s m y u t# . s c i o 1 r f redt U. . gita eJu g Valr P. ok pu su n t 28 U. . . 63 ( )1 ( )a d 5 e e r o S Ma sr t d e e i Co e r a t o e S C j 6 b ( )B n 1 LR I 1 4. Th Magita e Ju g s bm ie h rRepod and Re om m en a i n ( 6 )on 6 Be srt d e u t d e t c d to # 4 1 Nov m ber1 , 7 e 4 2008, ecom m endi gt at hi Cour ent ran or ergr ntng def ndant ' i n r n h ts te d ai e s Moto 1 f r Summar J dg en . Pl itf fld hi Obeci n t Ma ita e J d e' Repod an 8o y u m t an if i e s j t s o g sr t u g s o d 1 Recommendaton ( oc #65)on December11,2008 and def ndant fld a Response t 9 iD e si e o 2 Plit f Obec int Ma ita e J d e' Rep d and Rec m m en a in ( 6 )on Dec mber 0 an i ' j t o g sr t u g s o fs o o d to # 6 e 21 26,2008. 22 23 A. 1 ANALYSI . S Revi w ofM agi t at Judge' O r er e sr e sd 2 4 Anyp dymayobec t amagita ej dge' c s dipo iv pr p s dor erfn igs a j to s r t u s a e s st e o o e d ,id n , i 2 orr c m m en a i n . 28 U. . .j 63 ( )1 ( ) Fe . . i. .72( ) L 74. . e ditit 5 eo d to s SC 6 b ( )B ' d R C V P , b ' R 2 Th s r , c 2 c ur mu tmak a de nov de er ia in o t o e p din o t e ma ita e j dg ' r p r 6 ot s e o t m n to f h s o o s f h g s rt u es e o t 2 t whihobec in i mad an maya c pt rj c, modi ,nwh l ori p d,h f digs 7 o c jt s e d o c e ,e e t or f i oe n a te i n y n 2 or ec m menda i n mad b t e magitat j d e.J= De n v r vew mean t ec udmus 8 ro t s e yh o sr e u g J . o o e i sh o t 1 1 consi ert e m at er anew ,t e sam e as i i had notbeen hear bef r and as i no deci i n dh t h ft d oe f so 2 pr vou l h d b en r n er d.Ne sv. e i sy a e e d e s Commisin r 95 F. d 1 95,1 97 ( t Ci. 99 ) s o e, 4 2 4 4 9h r1 2 . 3 Thus,al ough t e dititcour need nothol a de novo hearng,t e cour' obl aton i t t h h s rc t d ih t s i i so g 4 arie ati own ide en en c ncu in abou t o e p di n o t e magitat j d e' r v t s n p d t o lso th s o o s f h sr e u g s 5 fn igsorr c m men a i nt whih o j c insar made. Uni d St t sv.Remsiq,87 id n eo d t o c be t o o e t e ae n 4 6 F.d 61 , 7 ( t Ci.1 8 ) 2 4 61 9 h r 9 9 . 7 Afer nducig ade n v r vew o t e p ri n of h r c r obecedt b plit f t co tn o o e i f h o t s t e e o d j t o y an i , o f 8 t e Cour ac ep si wh l t e Magitae Ju g ' r c m m end t nsan fn igs( 6 ) h t c t n oe h srt d es e o ai o d id n # 4 . 9 l0 II C o Ncu sl s I uo I I HEREBY ORDERED t atdef ndant 'Moton f rSum mar Judgment( 60)i TS h e s io y #s G RA NTED 11 1 2 l 3 I I FURTHER ORDEREDt a plitfsObec in t Ma ita eJu g ' Reporan TS h t a n i' j t s o gs r t d e s f o td 1 Rec m menda i n( 65)i DENI D,Th Clr of h Coud s alen eru gm en ac or igy 4 o t#s o E e e k te h l t jd t c d n l. 1 5 1 6 1 7 18 19 20 I I SO O RD ER ED . TS DATED:Thi 6T day ofJanuar , 2009. sH y 21 22 UNI E D STATES DI TR I T JUDG E T SC 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?