GCM AIR GROUP LLC, a Nevada limited liability company v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc., a Pennyslvania Corporation
Filing
105
ORDER GRANTING D Chevron USA Inc's 77 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Brian E. Sandoval on 6/24/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1 2 3 4 5
6
7 8
UNI ED STATES DI TR I T COURT T S C
D I TR I T O F NEVA D A S C
9 GCM AI GROUP,LLC,a Nevada Li i d R mt e Li biiyCom pany, al t 1 0 Plit#, ani l1 v. 1 2 CHEVRO N U. . . I C .a Pennsylani S A ,N , va 1 Cor or ton, 3 p ai 1 4
15 16 17 18
Def ndant e .
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
3: 7 c - O1 8- ES- AM 0 -v 0 6 B R
ORDER
Curen l b f r t e Coud i Def n an Ch v on U. . .Ic. (ch vr n' Mot nf r r t eo e h y s ed t er SA n ' ' e o ' i o si )o Ator eysFees ( 77 fld on Ap i8, 9. Plit fGCM Ai Gr up LL (G CM ' fld an tn ' # )i e rl 200 ani f r o , C ' 'i )e O pp st nt De en an ' Mo inf rAtor eys F es ( 8 )on Ap i21, 9, d Che r n o io o f d ts to o t n ' e # 4 i rl 200 an vo
fld a Repl i Su pod ofi Mo i nf r t r e sFees( 95 on Ma 5, 9. i e yn p t to o Ato n y s #) y 200
BA C KG RO UN D The padi sar f m ii rwih t e f c s oft i case.As such, he Cour w il y st t t e e ea l a t h at hs t t lonl a e h f ct necessar t det r i e t e curentm oton f rator ey' f es. as y o em n h r i o t n se
19 20
21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
l 2005, CM and Chevr nent r d i t an Envionm ent f eem ent ort e pur ose n G o e e no r a Agr fh p of m oniorng and r m edi tng cont m i aton t atoccured as a r sul ofChevr n' r t i ti e ai ani h r et o s e al
s r ie s a in oper t ns on a pic ofpr ped a qui d b GCM. ( o i nf rAtor eys e vc t to ai o ee o yc r y e M t o tn ' o F es ( 7 )a ExhiiF) Ac or ig t t e En i nmenal eemen ,he padiswih d 'o e # 7 t bt . c d n o h vr o t Agr tt e se ' t
pr vi e f rt e necessar i ves i aton,sie assessm ent and cl an- p'oft e cont m i aton od oh y n tg i t , e u' h a ni
on t o adj cent par el. L- I t e contact t e paris agr ed t at Chevr n woul w a c s du n h r ,h t e eh o d
i vestgat ,m oniorand r m edi t t e cont m i aton l cat d on t e pr pedi s acquied by n ie t e ae h a ni o e ho e r
1 GCM as diect d oragr ed t by t e W ashoe Count DititHeaIh Depadm ent 1= re eo h y s rc t .J
.
2
The Envionm ent l eem enti cl ded a cl us r l tng t ator ey' f es.Accor i g r a Agr nu a e ea i o t n s e dn
3 t par gr ph 13 oft atagr em ent i ' ny pary t t i Agr em en shoul brng an ac i n o aa h e ,f' a t o hs e t di to 4 agai st heot ert enf r e t et r s of hi Agr em ent t e subs antal pr vaing padyshal nt h o oc h em ts e ,h t il e l y i l 5 be entted t r c ie such a sum as r asonabl ator ey' f es as shal be det r i ed by a il o e e v e e t n se l em n
6 Coud ofcompet ntj rsditon i s i pr c edig. ... ExhiiF,p.5. e u i c i n a d o e n ' 1t at bt '(
7 O nAprl 2007, C M fl d a I w suiagai s Chevr n bas d ont e c nt m i aton and i4, G i e a t nt o e h oa ni
8 r medit n oft e s bec pr p dis OnAu u t20, e ai o h uj t o e e . gs 2007, GCM fed a Sec n Amen ed i l od d
9 Complit( 16)whih al ged 17 causes ofacton agais Chevr n. These cli s wer an # cl e i nt o am e 1 based bot i con r ctand i t r. On Mar h 25,2009,t e Coud ent r d an Or er( 74) 0 h n ta n ot c h ee d#
11 gr nt gCh v onsu m al j dgmen onaI1 cli s.Ch vr n n w s ek a t r eysf esi ai n er m 'u y t I 7 am e o o e s to n ' e n
1 t e am ount of $367, 96, 5 pur uant t t e ator ey' f es pr vi i n i t e padi s' 2h 53 s oh tn se o so n h e
1 Envionm ent lAgr em ent 3 r a e .
1 4
15
ANA LY SI S
A f der lcour ' ppl s s at I w i a di er i acton t det r i e w het eran aw ar ea t' i t e a n ae v st yio em n h d
1 ofa t r e s'eesi al we . Ca a a Li As ur Co. L pet r 563F.d 83 , 47( t Ci. 6 to n y f s l d ' n d f s . v. a e , o e 3 7 8 9h r 1 20 9) I Ne a a, c ud ' an o awar at r eyf e une sau ho ied b sat t , ul or 7 0 .n vd a o t nt c d to n e s ls t rz y t ue r e
1 c n r c . Fr nkSe t l e er& Son ,nc v, t & Har er Ld.1 7 P.d 1 51, 059( ev. 8 o ta t' a ' te m v s I . Smi h m ,t ,9 3 0 1 N
1 20 8) I t i c se, h p risha e a c n r c ua p ovsonwhihpr viesf ra awar of 9 0 . n hs a t e a t ev o ta t l r ii c od o n d
20 ator ey' f es t t e pr vaing padyast t e enf r em entoft e Envionm ent l eem ent t n se oh e l i oh oc h r a Agr .
2 1 1 A pp od i nm ent . o
22
Chevr n i seeki g ador ey' f es pur uantt t e Envionm ent lAgr em en i t e os n n se s oh r a e tn h
23 amountof$367, 96. 5.Accor i g t Chevr n, 53 dn o o event ough G C M onl br ughtt r e specii h yo he fc
2 cl i s r ltng t t e br ach of t e Envicnm ent lAgr em ent i i entted t aI of i 4 am eai o h e h r a e ,t s il o I t s 25 r asonabl ator ey' f es i cured i t e def nse oft i case because 'he f c s underyi g e e t n se n r nh e hs ' at t ln 26 a1 of t e cl i s ar it rw i ed such t at i i i pr c i abl t appodi n c st bet een I h am e ne t n h t s m a tc e o o os w
2 p diul rcai s' ( e l ( 9 )at3) Ch vr nas erst at he c r o aIofGCM' c u es 7 a c a l m . R py # 5 ' . e o s t h t oe f I S as
28 ofacton ar ted t t e Envionm ent l eem entbecaus t atagr em entdi t t d t e t r s i ei oh r a Agr eh e ca e h e m
2
1 oft e r m editon f l w i g t e cont m i aton on t e si $. Ch v ont enas edst a t e he a i ol n h o ani ht e er h s h th
..
2 r m edi ton and cont m i aton f r t e basi ofal t e ot ercl i s asseded agai sti A s e ai a n i om h s lh h am nt
.
3 such,Chevr n cl i s t ataI oft e caus s ofacton ar it rel t d and t atis cos s t o am h Ih e i e ne r ae ht to 4 def nd agai stt e al gatons r l tng sol l t t e Envionm ent lAgr em ent cannot be e nhli e eai ey o h r a e
5 car ed ou . v tl
6
GCM does not iput t atChevr n i entted t ator ey' f es based ont e pr vi i n ds e h o s il o t n s e h o so
.
7 i t e Envionm ent lAgr em ent However G C M ar ues t at onl t r e cl i s i t e nh r a e , g h y he am n h 8 amended com pl itr l t t t atspecii contact Basedont i , C M ar uest atc hevr n' a n ea e o h fc r hs G g h os
.
9 mot n f r a t r eys f es 'm pr pe l r qu ss f es t a ar no a so it d ( i )t e i o to n ' e ' o r e e t e h t e t s ca e w t h o i y h
1 En ionm ent l eem ent'( litfsOpposiint Def ndantsMotonf rAtor ey' Fees 0 vr a Agr . P an i ' ' f to o e ' i o tn s
1 ( 84)a 3 . Bec u e t e En ion en al e men t al onyf ra t r e ' f e t en ore 1# t) a s h vr m t Agr e t' l l o to n ys e s o f c cs
1 t atspecii agr em ent'G C M st t st atChevr n i ' otentted t f es spenti connecton 2h fc e , ' ae h o s' n il o e n i 13 t t e ot erpori ns oft e l w sui ' L . oh h to ha t' d =
.
1 4
UnderNevada I w ,appodi nm entofator ey' f es i notmandat r when t e f es a o t n se s oy he
1 wer i cured f rr pr sen aton on an isue com m on t b0t a cause ofacton i whi h f es 5 en r o e e t i s oh in ce 1 ar pr perand one i whi ht ey ar notal w ed See Mavfel v. onhl,1 4 Nev 34,184 6 eo n ch e l o i d Kor i 2
. .
1 P.d 362,369 ( ev. 73 N zoo8ladoptngt e r asonig s tf rh i Abdal h v Unied Sav.Bank, t ihe n e ot n l a t
.
1 51Cal p rzd 28 ( aI t pp. 996 ) I Ma fel, h Nev d Supr me Co r hel t a in 8 . t. 6 C . . 1 ). n v i d t e a a R CA e u t d h t' i
1 anacton i w hih a pl i tf pur ues cl i s based on t e sam e f ct al r um st nc sagai st 9 in c a n if s am h a u cic ae n
20 m uli l def ndant , i i wihi t e ditit cour' di cr ton t det r i e whet er tp e e s t s tn h s rc ts s e i o em n h 21 appofi nm ent i r nder d i pr ctcabl by t e i t reltonshi oft e cl i s agai stt e to se e m ai e h ne r ai p h am nh
si t 2 mulil def ndant . != ' he ditrctcour m ust, how ever,atem ptt appodi n the cost 2 tpe e s' # T ' t o o s
.
23 bef r det r i i g t atappodi nm enti i pr ctcabl 'L= Alh u hMavf l dealwi t e o e e m nn h o s m a i e ' d. t o g id e tth h
.
24 isue ofappodi nm entas t m uli l def ndant , t e Nevada Supr m e Cour adopt d t e s o o tp e e sh e t eh
25 26
M qr o e,Chevon noe tatte . aort olChe r n, at r e feex e diur swee ev r r ts h h - j iy . v o s to n y e p n t e r m 27 icure i dlc vey 'a dlrl sn l de ostonwa f cusd e trl on adefns ofapatculr n rd n s o r ' n ûn o ig e p ii s o e n iey ee ri a ,,
cam. Rah r tej poiinsa d oh rdsov r weeaIu d ra e fr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?