Pierce v. Directors of Nevada DOC, et al

Filing 95

ORDER. The Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's 90 Report and Recommendation. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's 91 Objection to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that defenda nts' 60 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's 87 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED AS MOOT. FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' 92 Motion for Extension of Time to File d efendants' Opposition to plaintiff's Objection to Report and Recommendation is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 01/26/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)

1

26
2

3 4
5

6 7

U N I E D STATES D I T R I T C O U R T T SC DI TR I T O F NEVA DA S C

8 SPENCER PI RCE, E
9 Plit#, an i

) ) ) ) )

3:7- V- 02- CJ( M ) 0C 2 R M ORDER

1 DI ECTORS OF CORRECTI NS, eta/, j 0 l1 R O .)

1 2 13
1 4

Dfdn. e nat es

)

Bef r t e Cour i Plitfs Obecton t Magitat Judge' Repod and oe h t s a nir ji o sr e s

1 Recommendaton (90) fld on November 16,2009. Thi acin was r f red t U. . 5 i# ie s to ee r o S 1 Magitat Robed A.Mc uai, .pur uantt 28 U. . .j636( )1)B)andLR I 1- .Th 6 sr e o d Jr, s o SC b( ( B4 e 1 Magitat Judge submit d hi Repor and Recommendaton ( 90)on Ocober27,2009, 7 sr e te s t i# t
1 r com m endi g t att i Cour ent r an or er gr ntng Def ndant 'Moton f r Summar 8e n h hs te d ai e s io y

1 J dg en ( 60 an d nyn a mo tPlitf Mo in f rPr l i a y Ij nci n ( 87) 9 u m t # ) d e ig s o a ni ' to o e i n r n u to # , fs m
20 Def ndant 'i d t ei Opposiin t Plitfs Objctont Magitat Judge' Repor and e s fl h r e to o an ir ei o sr e s t 21 Rec mmen ai n ( 93)o De e b r1 ,20 9 a d Plit f i d hi Repyt Deen a t' o dt # o n c m e 7 0 n a n i fl s l o f d n s fe 22 Opposii nt Plitf' Obecint Magitat Judge' Repod and Rec mmendaton(/ 4) to o an ifs j to o sr e s o i /9
23 on Decem ber 31,2009.
24 1 A NA LY S I . S

25 A.

Revi w ofMagi tat Judge' Or er e sr e sd

2 6 Puru n t 28 U. . . 6 6 b)1 ( )a d LR I 3 2, par ma fl s e icwr t n s a to S C j 3 ( ( )B n B - a t y i p cf ie y e it 27 obect nst t e fndigsandr commendatonsofa magitat j dge made puruantt LR j i oh i n o e i sr e u s o
28 I 1- . The di t i tcour m ustm ake a de novo det r i aton oft ose por i ns oft e B4 s rc t em n i h to h

1 magitat j dge' r por t whih obj cin i made and may acc pt rj c,ormodiy,i sr e u s e t o c e to s e , ee t fn 2 whol ori par,t efndigsorr commendatons made byt e magitat j dge. LR I 3e n th i n e i h sr e u B 3 2( ) Denovor viw meanst ec ud mustconsiert emateranew,t esame asiihad b, ee ho dh t h ft
4 not been hear bef r and as i no decsi n pr vi usl had been r nder d. Ness v, d oe f io eo y e e

5 Commisiner 954 F. d 1495,1497 ( t Ci.1 92) Thus,alhought edititcour need so , 2 9h r 9 . t h src t
6 not hol a de novo hearng, t e c ur ' obl aton i t ar i e at is own i dependent d i h o ts i i s o rv g t n

7 conclsi nabouthosepori nsofhemagitat jdge' fndigsorr commendatont whih uo t to t sr e u s i n e io c 8 obecins ar made,Uni d St t sv.Remsin,874 F.d 614,617 ( t Ci.1989) j to e t ae e n 2 9h r .
9 Afer conduc i g a de nov r vi w oft e r cor ,t e Cour accept and adopt t e t tn oe e h e dh ' t s sh

1 Magitat Judge' Repor and Recommendaton ( 90) 0 sr e s t i#.
1l 11 CO NC LU S I N 1. O

1 2 I I HEREBY ORDERED t atPlitf' Objctont Magitat Judge' Repor and TS h an if s ei o sr e s l 1 Rec m mendaton ( 91)i DENI D. 3 o i# s E 1 4 1 6
1 8

I I FURTHER ORDERED t atDef ndant ' i nForSummar Judgment( 60)i TS h e s Moto y #s I I FURTHER ORDERED t atPlitf sMotonf rPr lmiar lj ncton ( 87)i TS h an ir i o ei n y nu i # s
I I FURTH E R O RD E R E D t at Def ndant 'M oton f r Ex ensi n ofTi e t Fi TS h e s io to mol e

1 G RA N T ED . 5

17 DEN I D as M O O T , E

1 Def ndant 'Opposiin t Plitf' Obecin t Repod and Recommendaton ( 92)i 9 e s to o an ifs j to o i# s
20 G RANTED .

21
22
23
24 25

The Cl r oft e Cour shalenerjdgmentaccor igl. ek h t ltu dn y
I I SO O R D ER E D . TS
DATED:Thi s day ofJanual ,2010, ' y

26
27 28

Rober c.J t U N I ED ST T

s ES D I TR I T JU D G E SC