Laguna v. Brackbill et al

Filing 26

ORDER. In this case defendant has not filed an objection to the 22 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Although no objection was file, this Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and accepts it. Accordingly, IT IS ORDE RED, that Defendants' 14 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. (Joseph Brackbill; Debra Brooks; R. Chambliss; James G. Cox; Adam Endel; Kathy King; C. Large; E. K. McDaniel; John Pearce; Howard Skolnick; Delmar Snider; Christina Tripp; James Baca and Bruce Bannister terminated.) Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/29/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)

Download PDF
. . .. . r I J l 3 4 'i;u;( . u; FiD t -.) ' ... ; ' ', . u ('crr.g (kt.:, )J t ,.f; z)y f, ' ,tF:a. )y àz ih ; . . ' f OC'2 S-.r,y j j ; f .g).) .s . , ' z) ' :! 1 ; .y -. L.lLw;v 1-z . .. . F 1 p. . , 4 cs jT 7s 5 6 U N I E D STATES D I T R I T C O U R T T SC 7 DI TR I T O F NEVADA SC 8 JOEY L G UNA, A 9 Plit#' a ni ) ) ) ) 3:7- V- 44- CJ( AM) 0C 2 R R ORDER l JOSEPH BRACKBI L,ela/, ov . 1l L . l 2 13 1 4 ) ) ) Df dn . e nat es ? Bef r t e Cour i t e Repor and Recommendaton oft e Unied St t s Magitat oe h 's h t t i h t ae sr e 1 Judge ( 22)(Recommendaton' ener d on August25,2009. Thi actonwasr f redt 5 #' ' i ) te si ee r o 1 U. . s rt Ro edA. ouad, r1 ur u n t 2 U. . . 6 6( )1)B) dLR I 14. 6 S Magita e b Mc i J .p s a to 8 S C j 3 b ( ( an B1 Afera t or ugh r viw ,t e Magitat Judge r com m ends t att i Cour ent ran or er 7t ho ee h sr e e h hs te d 1 g anig d f n a t'mo in f rs m ma yjdg en ( 1 ) No obecin t t e Rep r a d 8 r t e e d n s to o u r u m t # 4 , n j to o h ot n 19 Recom m endaton has been fl d. i ie 20 1 Dl cussl s .s o 21 Thi Cour d ay acc pt rjct or modiy,i whol or i par,te fndigs or s t' m e , ee , fn e n 'h in t 2 r c mmen ai n ma eb t emagitae.2 U. . . 6 6 b)1 .Fu t erun e 2 U. . . 2 eo d t s d yh o sr t ' 8 S C j 3 ( ( ) rh , d r 8 S C ' 2 j 6 6 b)1 ,i a p r mak s a t el obe t n t t e ma itae jdgesr c mme d to , 3 3 ( ( ) f at y e i y j ci o h m o g sr t u ' e o n a in 24 tent i Cour i r quied t ' ak a de novo det r iaton oftose pori nsoft e(epor h hs ts e r o d e m em n i h t o hr t 25 and r commendaton t whih obecin i made.l Neverhels ,t e sat t does not e i q o c j to s ' ' t e s h t ue 26 'equieg)some lsserr viw by (hi Courqwhen no obj ctonsar 5ld. Thomasv.Ar , rr e ee ts t ei e e' ' n 27 28 1 Fo a o gcint b t ey a p r mu ts rea dfeiwl i 1 da sa tr i( s r e wi t ema itaejd esrp ra d r n be t o e ù l. at s ev n i l t n 0 y fe bec1 ev d t h gsrt u g , e o t n o m y l h h rc mmedtn2 U. C. 6 6( )1( ) eo nal . 8 S. j 3 b ()C . o 1 1 474 U. .1 0,1 9-50( 985) lst ad,undert esat t ,hi Cour i notr quiedt c nduct S4 4 1 .n e h t ue t s ts e r o o 2 ' nyr ve a aI. . f yis et a i n thes be t fanobe ton...a 1 9.Si i r , ' e iw t I . o an s u h ts o t u j c o a j ci '! t 4 'j . ml l ay 3 t e Ni t Cicui has r cogni ed t ata dititcoud i notr quied t r vi w a magi tat h nh r t e zh s rc s e r oee sr e 4 j dge' r por and r com mendatonwher noobjctonshavebeenfîd.See Unied St t s u se t e i e ei ie t ae 3 1 9 h r200 ( se a d n h t d r rve m ly 5 v.Reyna-rapa, 28F. d11 4( t Ci. 3)dir g r igt esan a dofe iw e po ed - i3 - 6 byt edititc urwhenr viwigar porandr c m mendatont whihnoobj ci nswer h s rc o t ee n e t eo ioc e to e 7 madel see alo Schmitv. ; s d Johnst ne,263 F. upp,2d 1 1 ,1 26 ( . i, o s 2 9 2 D Arz 2003)(eadig rn 8 t e Ni t C ic i' deci i n i Reyna- api as adoptng t e vi w t atdi t i tcours ar not h n h r u ts so n Ta iheh s rc te 9 r quied t r vew ' nyisue t ati nott e subectofan obj cin.) Thus,it er i no e r o ei ' s a hs h j e to '. fh e s 1 obecin t a magitat j dge' r com mendaton, t en t i Cour may accept t e 0 j to o sr e u s e ih hs t h l1 r commendatonwihoutr viw .See e. .Johnst ne,263 F. upp.2d at1226 ( cceptng, e it ee q, o s a i 1 wih u r viw, magsr t j d esr c m me da in t whc n obe t nwa fe ) 2 to t e e a itae t g ' e o a n t o ih o jc i o o s id . l 1 3 I t i c se,def ndanthasnoti danobecint t e Magitat Judge' Reporand n hs a e fl e j to o h sr e s t 1 Recommendaton.Al ough no obectonwasfld,hi Cour has rviwedt eRepod and 4 i t h ji i ts e t ee h 1 Rec m mendaton ( 22) and accept i.Accor igl, 5 o i#, st dn y 1 6 I. CO N C LU S I N I O 1 7 1 9 I I HEREBY ORDERED t atDef ndant'Motonf rSummar J dgmen ( 1 )i TS h e s io yu t# 4 s I I SO O R D E R E D . TS 1 GRANTED,The Cl r o t eCo d s ale t r u gmen a c r ig, 8 e k f h u h l ne jd t c o dn 2 0 21 22 23 D T DTi,/ dy f c br20. A E :h J a oOt e,09 sJ o 24 25 R obed C . e Jo UNI ED ST T S DI TRI T JUDGE SC 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?