Ingebretsen v. Palmer

Filing 67

ORDER granting 66 petitioner's Motion to Extend Time to respond to Court Order. Petitioner need not file a response to the court's order 63 until the court has ruled upon 65 petitioner's MOTION for District Judge to Reconsider Order re 63 Order on Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/13/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _________________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Petitioner having submitted a Motion for Enlargement of Time Within Which to Otherwise Respond to Court Order (#66), and good cause appearing; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Enlargement of Time Within Which to Otherwise Respond to Court Order (#66) is GRANTED. Petitioner need not file a response to the Court's Order (#63) until the Court has ruled upon his Motion for Reconsideration (#65). DATED this 13th day of January, 2010. vs. JACK PALMER, et al., Respondents. JOHN INGEBRETSEN, Petitioner, Case No. 3:07-CV-00251-LRH-(RAM) ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA