Ingebretsen v. Palmer
ORDER granting 66 petitioner's Motion to Extend Time to respond to Court Order. Petitioner need not file a response to the court's order 63 until the court has ruled upon 65 petitioner's MOTION for District Judge to Reconsider Order re 63 Order on Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/13/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _________________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Petitioner having submitted a Motion for Enlargement of Time Within Which to Otherwise Respond to Court Order (#66), and good cause appearing; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Enlargement of Time Within Which to Otherwise Respond to Court Order (#66) is GRANTED. Petitioner need not file a response to the Court's Order (#63) until the Court has ruled upon his Motion for Reconsideration (#65). DATED this 13th day of January, 2010. vs. JACK PALMER, et al., Respondents. JOHN INGEBRETSEN, Petitioner, Case No. 3:07-CV-00251-LRH-(RAM) ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?