Ingebretsen v. Palmer

Filing 77

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that P's 76 unopposed motion for enlargement of time in which to file a reply to the opposition to motion for reconsideration (second request) is GRANTED. P shall have through May 10, 2010 to file and serve a reply to Rs' 72 opposition to motion for reconsideration. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/23/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _________________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Petitioner having submitted an unopposed motion for enlargement of time in which to file a reply to the opposition to motion for reconsideration (second request) (#76), and good cause appearing; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's unopposed motion for enlargement of time in which to file a reply to the opposition to motion for reconsideration (second request) (#76) is GRANTED. Petitioner shall have through May 10, 2010 to file and serve a reply to respondents' opposition to motion for reconsideration (#72). DATED this 23rd day of April, 2010. vs. JACK PALMER, et al., Respondents. JOHN INGEBRETSEN, Petitioner, Case No. 3:07-CV-00251-LRH-(RAM) ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?