RAMIREZ v. Crawford et al

Filing 182

JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED thatPlaintiff's claims, as set forth at III,B.3(1), (2)and(4)-16 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as a result of Plaintiff's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintif fs claim that he suffered hearing loss as a result of his confinement 37 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because it is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs claims: (1) alleging due process violations as a result of being confined in de facto administrative segregation from 09/31/2005 to 06/27/2006 and 08/29/2006 to 10/10/2006, and (2) alleging deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in violation of the Eight Amendment are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs remaining state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants motion for summary judgment 154 is GRANTED as to all remaining claims. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 3/21/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)

-RAM RAMIREZ v. Crawford et al

Doc. 182

AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

r

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
***** DISTRICT OF NEVADA

MIGUEL A. RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, V. CASE NUMBER: 3:07-CV-00294-RCJ-RAM ADAMSON, et al., Defendants. Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. Decision by Court. This action came to be considered before the Court. The issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered.

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

X

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's claims, as set forth at III,B.3(1), (2)and(4)-16 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as a result of Plaintiff's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's claim that he suffered hearing loss as a result of his confinement [37] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because it is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims: (1) alleging due process violations as a result of being confined in de facto administrative segregation from 09/31/2005 to 06/27/2006 and 08/29/2006 to 10/10/2006, and (2) alleging deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in violation of the Eight Amendment are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's remaining state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment [154] is GRANTED as to all remaining claims.

March 21, 2011 Date

LANCE S. WILSON Clerk /s/ M. Campbell Deputy Clerk

Dockets.Justia.com