Nasby v. McDaniel et al

Filing 206

ORDER granting ECF No. 205 Motion for Enlargement of Time. Nasby has until December 18, 2020, to file and serve a reply in support of the remaining grounds of the Amended Petition (ECF No. 176 ). No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 12/2/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)

Download PDF
Case 3:07-cv-00304-LRH-WGC Document 206 Filed 12/02/20 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 *** 6 BRENDAN NASBY, 7 8 9 10 11 12 Case No. 3:07-cv-00304-LRH-WGC Petitioner, v. ORDER E.K. MCDANIEL, et al., Respondents. This habeas matter is before the Court on Petitioner Brendan Nasby’s unopposed second Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 205). 13 The Court has repeatedly warned: “Further extensions of time are not likely to be granted 14 absent compelling circumstances and a strong showing of good cause why the briefing could not 15 be completed within the extended time allowed despite the exercise of due diligence. (See ECF 16 Nos. 183, 190, 192, 198, 202, 204 (emphasis omitted).) 17 Nasby now seeks a “final” 15-day extension to file and serve a reply in support of the 18 amended petition’s remaining grounds. 19 additional time is necessary to complete the reply brief. The extension will therefore be granted. 20 However, the Court will enforce counsel’s representation that this is the final extension of time 21 necessary to complete the reply—no further extensions will be granted. He provides detailed and compelling reasons why 22 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: Petitioner Brendan Nasby’s unopposed second Motion 23 for Enlargement of Time (ECF No. 205) is GRANTED. Nasby has until December 18, 2020, to 24 file and serve a reply in support of the remaining grounds of the Amended Petition (ECF No. 176). 25 No further extensions will be granted. 26 DATED this 2nd day of December 2020. 27 LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?