Nasby v. McDaniel et al
Filing
206
ORDER granting ECF No. 205 Motion for Enlargement of Time. Nasby has until December 18, 2020, to file and serve a reply in support of the remaining grounds of the Amended Petition (ECF No. 176 ). No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 12/2/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)
Case 3:07-cv-00304-LRH-WGC Document 206 Filed 12/02/20 Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
***
6
BRENDAN NASBY,
7
8
9
10
11
12
Case No. 3:07-cv-00304-LRH-WGC
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
E.K. MCDANIEL, et al.,
Respondents.
This habeas matter is before the Court on Petitioner Brendan Nasby’s unopposed second
Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 205).
13
The Court has repeatedly warned: “Further extensions of time are not likely to be granted
14
absent compelling circumstances and a strong showing of good cause why the briefing could not
15
be completed within the extended time allowed despite the exercise of due diligence. (See ECF
16
Nos. 183, 190, 192, 198, 202, 204 (emphasis omitted).)
17
Nasby now seeks a “final” 15-day extension to file and serve a reply in support of the
18
amended petition’s remaining grounds.
19
additional time is necessary to complete the reply brief. The extension will therefore be granted.
20
However, the Court will enforce counsel’s representation that this is the final extension of time
21
necessary to complete the reply—no further extensions will be granted.
He provides detailed and compelling reasons why
22
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: Petitioner Brendan Nasby’s unopposed second Motion
23
for Enlargement of Time (ECF No. 205) is GRANTED. Nasby has until December 18, 2020, to
24
file and serve a reply in support of the remaining grounds of the Amended Petition (ECF No. 176).
25
No further extensions will be granted.
26
DATED this 2nd day of December 2020.
27
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?