Nasby v. McDaniel et al

Filing 62

ORDER GRANTING 61 Motion to Reopen Case. FURTHER ORD Clerk shall REOPEN THIS FILE. FURTHER ORD Rs' answer/response to surviving grounds due by 6/4/2012. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 4/19/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 BRENDAN NASBY, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) E.K. McDANIEL, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ____________________________________) 3:07-cv-0304-ECR-RAM ORDER 14 15 Petitioner has filed a motion seeking to reopen this habeas corpus case (ECF No. 61). 16 This action was dismissed without prejudice, and the case closed administratively, 17 pursuant to an Order entered May 13, 2011 (ECF No. 55). In the Order dismissing the case, the 18 Court indicated that this case is subject to being reopened upon a motion by petitioner. See id. 19 Petitioner’s further state-court proceedings have apparently concluded, and petitioner 20 has now returned to this Court seeking to reopen this case. Respondents do not object to the case 21 being reopened. The Court will therefore grant petitioner’s motion to reopen this case. 22 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s Motion to Reopen Case 23 (ECF No. 61) is GRANTED. 24 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall REOPEN THIS FILE. 25 26 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall have forty-five (45) days 2 from entry of this order to answer or otherwise respond to the surviving grounds of the petition 3 found in the court record at ECF No. 10. 4 Dated this 19th day of April, 2012. 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?