Sonntag v. Balaam et al

Filing 117

ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's # 106 Report and Recommendation, is adopted and accepted, and D Judge Steinheimer's # 93 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and Judge Steinheimer is DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that P's # 107 Objection to the Report and Recommendation is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 8/12/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr., (#1061) entered on May 6, 2010, recommending granting Defendant Judge Steinheimer's Motion to Dismiss (Doc #93). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Report and Recommendation (#107) on May 25, 2010. The Court has conducted it's de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#106) entered on May 6, 2010, should be adopted and accepted. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#106) entered on May 6, 2010, is adopted and accepted, and Defendant Judge Steinheimer's Motion to Dismiss (#93) is GRANTED and Judge Steinheimer is DISMISSED with prejudice. /// /// /// /// v. DENNIS BALAAM, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________ JASON ERIC SONNTAG, Plaintiff, ORDER 3:07-CV-311-RCJ(RAM) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 1 Refers to court's docket number. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Objection to the Report and Recommendation (#107) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: this 12th day of August, 2010. _____________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?