Sonntag v. Balaam et al
Filing
140
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the 126 , 127 , 128 , 131 , and 133 are DENIED. FURTH ORD that the 134 Motion to Stay is DENIED. FURTH ORD that the 136 Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP on Appeal is GRANTED. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/31/2011. (NEF sent to USCA)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
JASON ERIC SONNTAG,
9
Plaintiff,
10
vs.
11
DENNIS BALAAM et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
3:07-cv-00311-RCJ -RAM
3:07-cr-00311-RCJ-RAM
ORDER
14
15
Plaintiff Jason Eric Sonntag sued several Defendants for constitutional violations arising
16
out of his pretrial detention at the Washoe County Jail. The Court granted summary judgment to
17
Defendants as against the remaining claims in the Third Amended Complaint. (See Order, Mar.
18
3, 2011, ECF No. 124). Plaintiff has appealed, but several motions remain pending upon which
19
the Court must rule before the Court of Appeals may consider the appeal. Although variously
20
titled, all the motions except two are in substance motions to reconsider, and the Court declines
21
to reconsider. As to the remaining two motions, the Court declines to grant a stay but grants
22
leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3).
23
///
24
///
25
///
1
2
3
CONCLUSION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions to Reconsider (ECF Nos. 126, 127, 128,
131, 133) are DENIED.
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Stay (ECF No. 134) is DENIED.
5
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on
6
Appeal (ECF No. 136) is GRANTED.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated this 31st day of May, 2011.
9
10
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?