Friedman v. State Of Nevada et al
ORDER RE SHOW CAUSE why Respondents should not be sanctioned for failure to comply with court's order of 08/07/2009 103 . ( Show Cause Response due by 10/30/2009.) See order re specifics. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 10/15/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 STATE OF NEVADA, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE vs. KENNETH FRIEDMAN, Petitioner, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On August 7, 2009, the court entered an order requiring, inter alia, respondents to file a response to petitioner's second amended petition within thirty days of being served with the same. (Docket #103.) On August 24, 2009, petitioner filed a second amended petition. (Docket #104.) The second amended petition contains a certificate of service on respondents' counsel dated August 20, 2009. More than thirty days have passed and respondents have not filed a response to the second amended petition. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents shall, within ten days of the date of service of this order, SHOW CAUSE why they should not be sanctioned for failure to comply with the court's order of August 7, 2009. DATED this 15TH day of October, 2009.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?