Kieren, Jr. v. State of Nevada Attorney General

Filing 93

ORDER - Rs' motion for extension of time to respond to petitioner's objections (ECF No. 89 ) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's first and second motions for extension of time to file a reply in suppo rt of petitioner's objections (ECF Nos. 91 and 92 ) are both GRANTED nunc pro tunc. Reply to ECF No. 90 Response re ECF No. 86 Objections is due by 12/15/2017. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/14/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9

DENNIS K. KIEREN, JR.,

10

Case No. 3:07-cv-00341-LRH-WGC
Petitioner, ORDER

v.
11
12

STATE OF NEVADA ATTORNEY
GENERAL, et al.,

13

Respondents.

14
15
16
17
18

This counseled habeas matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 comes before the court on
several motions to extend time. Good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED that respondents’ motion for extension of time to respond to
petitioner’s objections (ECF No. 89) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc.

19

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s first and second motions for extension

20

of time to file a reply in support of petitioner’s objections (ECF Nos. 91 and 92) are both

21

GRANTED nunc pro tunc. The reply is due thirty (30) days from the date of the entry of

22

this order.

23

DATED this 14th day of November, 2017.

24
25
26

LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

27
28
1