Aparicio v. McDaniel et al

Filing 97

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that P's 92 and 94 motions to transport prisoner and provide reasonable access are DENIED without prejudice as moot following upon the rescheduling of the evidentiary hearing. P may renew the requests in full or part as required and/or necessary in connection with the rescheduled hearing date. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 5/12/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 HUGO APARICIO, 10 Petitioner, 3:07-cv-00427-LRH-VPC 11 vs. 12 13 14 ORDER E.K. MCDANIEL, et al., Respondents. 15 16 Petitioner’s motions (## 92 & 94) to transport prisoner and provide reasonable access are 17 DENIED without prejudice as moot following upon the rescheduling of the evidentiary hearing. 18 Petitioner may renew the requests in full or in part as required and/or necessary in connection with the 19 rescheduled hearing date. 20 DATED this 12th day of May, 2011. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ___________________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?