Bolin v. McDaniel et al
ORDER that stay is VACATED.FURTHER ORDER counsel for Petitioner shall have 30 days to obtain case files from prior counsel and to confer with petitioner. Counsel shall have 45 days to review record. Respondents shall provide any portion of rec ord not contained in case files or previously filed as exhibit. FURTHER ORDER petitioner shall have 60 days to file Notice of Abandonment, indicating unexhausted claims identified in 90 Order, are to be deleted from second amended petition [49 ]. FURTHER ORDER, if petitioner does not abandon claims, the second amended petition 49 shall be dismissed. Please see attached for specific details. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/11/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
GREGORY D. BOLIN,
Case No. 3:07-cv-00481-MMD-VPC
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
On June 13, 2012, this court discharged Saor Stetler as counsel for the
petitioner, Gregory D. Bolin, in this capital habeas corpus case. (Dkt. no. 115.) The
court also stayed proceedings pending the appointment of new counsel. Id.
On July 9, 2012, the court entered an order appointing David K. Neidert to
represent the petitioner in this case. (Dkt. no. 117.) Mr. Neidert has entered a notice of
appearance. (Dkt. no. 118.) As such, the court shall reopen proceedings in this case.
However, the court will also allow a period of time for counsel to familiarize himself with
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the stay in this case is VACATED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for petitioner shall have thirty (30)
days from the date of entry of this order to obtain petitioner’s case files from prior
counsel (which prior counsel is ordered to provide) and to confer with petitioner at
petitioner’s place of confinement. Counsel shall have forty-five (45) days from the date
of entry of this order to review the record of state and federal proceedings. At counsel’s
request, respondents shall provide any portion of the state court record not contained in
petitioner’s case files or previously filed as an exhibit in this proceeding.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall have sixty (60) days from the
date this order is entered within which to file a Notice of Abandonment of Unexhausted
Claims, indicating that unexhausted claims identified in this court’s order of September
27, 2011 (dkt. no. 90), are to be deleted from his second amended petition (dkt. no. 49)
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if petitioner does not abandon his unexhausted
claims within the time allowed, the second amended petition (dkt. no. 49) shall be
dismissed under Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509 (1982).
DATED THIS 11th day of July 2012.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?