Ortiz v. Nevada Department Of Corrections et al

Filing 46

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS in whole the 37 R&R. FURTH ORD that Ds' 25 Motion to Enforce Settlement is GRANTED. FURTH ORD that P's 26 Motion is DENIED. FURTH ORD that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice with the parties to bear their own costs and atty fees. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/23/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)

1 2 3 4 5

6
7

UNI ED STATES DI TR I T CO UR T T SC
DI TR I T O F NEVADA S C

8 FRANK ORTI , Z 9
1 0 1 2
13

Plit f ani, f
v. Def ndant . e s

1 I I RO BACA,etaI 1 SD . ,

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

3: 7 * - 31 RCJ( PC) O- 5 - V ORDER

t-. .j .. aj

1 4 Bef r t e Cour i Pl it r Obec in t Magita e Co k ' J nuar 1 ,20 9 oe h t s an i s j t o f o s r t o es a y 5 0 1 Rec m men a i n( 39 fldo J nu r 26, 9. sa t nwa r f redt U. . itat 5 o d t # ) i n a a y 200 Thi c i o e o s e e r o S Mags r e 1 Ju geVaer P. ke pu s a tt 28 U. . . 636( )1 ( )an L I 1 4.Th Magitat 6d l i Coo e ru n o SC 5 b ( )B d R B e sr e
1 Ju g s bm iedh rRep ran Rec m m en a in( 3 ) Janu r 1 , 009,e om m en ig 7 de u t e t ot d o d t # 7 on o ay 5 2 rc dn
1 t att i Coud ent ran or ergr ntng def ndant 'm oton t enf r e setl m entagr em ent 8 h hs e d ai e s i o oc te e

1 ( 25)an den ig Pl it f Mot n f rOr er En or ig Set men Agr e en and f r 9# d yn a n i' fs iod o f cn tl e t em t o 20 San t nsan Requ s f r c ins( 2 ) De en an s Res o s t : an ir Not eo n ci o d e to San t # 6 . f d t ' p n e o Plit s i f o o f c 21 Opp st nb Def n an s, aier fRepl Requ s f rSub ison( 41 wa fld onMar h o io y e d t ' v o i W y e to m si # ) s i e c
22 17,2009.

23
24 A.

1 ANALYSI . S
Revi w ofM agi t at Judge' O r er e sr e sd

25 Pur u n t 28 U. . .j 63 ( )1 ( )a d LR I 3 2, pa t mayfl s ecf wr t n s a to SC 6 b ( )B n B - a ry i p ic ie e it 2 obec inst t e fn igsan r c m mend t nso a m a ita ej dge mad pur u n t LR 6 jt o o h id n d eo ai f o gs r t u e s a to
27 I 1 4. The ditit coud m ust m ake a de novo det r i aton of t ose podi ns of t e Bs rc emn i h o h

28 mags r t j d e' r p r t whc obeci n i ma e an ma ac ep ,rj c , modi ,n ita e u g s e ol o ih j t s d d y c t e e t or o fi y

l whol ornpad,h fn igsorec m m en at n ma eb t em a ita ej dg .LR I 3 2( ) ei t e id n ro d i s d y h gs r t u e o B - b.
2 De novo r vi w m eans t e coud m us consi ert e m ateranew ,t e same as i i had not ee h t dh t h ft 3 been hear bef r and as i no deci i n pr vi usl had been r nder d. Ness v. d oe f so eo y e e

4 Comm ison r 95 F.d 1 95,1 9 ( t Ci.1 92) Thu , t ou ht e dititc ur n e s i e, 4 2 4 4 7 9 h r 9 . s al g h sr o t e d h c
5 nothol a de novo hearng, he coud' obl aton i t arie atis own i dependentconcl si n d it s i i so r g v t n uo

6 abou t os p din of h ma itat j dge' f dig orec m m enda int whihobeci n th e o o s t e g sr e u s i n s r o n to o c j to s 7 ar ma e. Uni d St t sv. ed t e a e Remsn .87 F.d 61 , 7 ( t Ci. 89 . in 4 2 4 61 9 h r 19 )
8 Aferconductng a de novo r vi w oft e r cor ,t e Cour accept and adopt t e t i ee h e dh t s sh

9 Magitat Judge' Mi uesoft e Coud ( 37) sr e s nt h #.
1 0 11 11 CO N CLUSI N 1. O I I HEREBY O RD ER ED t att e coud ACCEPTS and ADOPTS i whol t e Repod TS hh n eh

1 an Rec m m en at n ofU. . 2d o di o S Magitae Ju ge ( 3 ) srt d # 7 1 3 I I FURTHER ORDERED t atDef nda t ' tont En or et e Se t m en ( 25) TS h e n s Mo i o f c h tl t # e
1 i G RA NTED . 4s 1 5 I I FURTHER ORDERED t atPl i tf' Moton f rO r erenf r i g Novem ber18, TS h a n ifs io d o cn

1 2 08, Setl mentAgr em en 'an Req es f r Sanci ns Agais Def n ans ( 26) i 60 t e e td , u to to nt e d t # s
1 D EN I . 7 ED

1 8
20

I I FURTHER ORDERED t a t i ca ei DI M I SED wi prj diewi t epadis TS h ths s s S S t eu c t h h h e
I I SO O RD ER ED . TS

1 t beart ei own cost and ator ey' f es. 9o hr s tn se

2 1
22

D TED: i 'Z d yo Oco e, 0 9. A Ths IY a f tb r2 0
w

/
l

,

2 3
24

z2-

.

,

Robed C Jo es' ' .

2 5
26

UI DLA' DsRc JD E NT T'h l l UG E I TT E

27
28