Cox v. Whorton et al

Filing 138

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's # 134 Report and Recommendation is adopted and accepted and Plaintiff's Motions for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction for Ambulatory Assistance ( #'s 124 & 125 ) are DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 2/13/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7
8
9
10
11

STEVE MICHAEL COX,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
GLEN WHORTON, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________ )

3:08-CV-00110-RCJ(VPC)
ORDER

12

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge

13

(#134) (“Recommendation”) entered August 2, 2011, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that

14

this Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction for

15

Ambulatory Assistance (#’s 124 & 125). Plaintiff filed his Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Report &

16

Recommendation (#136) on August 15, 2011.

17

The Court has conducted it’s de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of

18

the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant

19

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s

20

Report and Recommendation (#134) entered August 2, 2011, should be adopted and accepted.

21

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#134)

22

entered December 22, 2011, is adopted and accepted, and Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining

23

Order and Preliminary Injunction are (#’s 124 & 125) are DENIED. 124 & 125) are DENIED.
for Ambulatory Assistance (#'s

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

DATED: This 13th day of February, 2012.

26
27

_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
Chief Judge

28

1