Polk v. Clark County et al
ORDER - Plaintiff's motions ECF Nos. 39 , 40 , 41 , and 42 are DENIED. No further papers should be filed in this closed case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 8/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
CLARK COUNTY, et al.,
MINUTES OF THE COURT
August 17, 2017
THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
On December 24, 2008, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint and ordered that plaintiff
be permitted to proceed only as to Count IV against defendant Kavcos (ECF No. 12). The U.S.
Marshal attempted service on Scott Kavcos but was unsuccessful and the summons was returned
unexecuted (ECF No. 23). Therefore, the District Court dismissed this lone remaining
defendant, Scott Kavcos, without prejudice (ECF No. 24).
Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal in August 2009 (ECF No. 25). The Ninth Circuit
affirmed the District Court’s decision in April 2015 (ECF No. 35). This matter was then
concluded in its entirety.
Therefore, plaintiff’s motions ECF Nos. 39, 40, 41, and 42 are DENIED. No further
papers should be filed in this closed case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?