Polk v. Clark County et al

Filing 44

ORDER - Plaintiff's motions ECF Nos. 39 , 40 , 41 , and 42 are DENIED. No further papers should be filed in this closed case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 8/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
RENARD POLK,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CLARK COUNTY, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_____________________________ )
PRESENT:

3:08-CV-0134-LRH (VPC)
MINUTES OF THE COURT
August 17, 2017

THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEPUTY CLERK:

LISA MANN

REPORTER: NONE APPEARING

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
On December 24, 2008, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint and ordered that plaintiff
be permitted to proceed only as to Count IV against defendant Kavcos (ECF No. 12). The U.S.
Marshal attempted service on Scott Kavcos but was unsuccessful and the summons was returned
unexecuted (ECF No. 23). Therefore, the District Court dismissed this lone remaining
defendant, Scott Kavcos, without prejudice (ECF No. 24).
Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal in August 2009 (ECF No. 25). The Ninth Circuit
affirmed the District Court’s decision in April 2015 (ECF No. 35). This matter was then
concluded in its entirety.
Therefore, plaintiff’s motions ECF Nos. 39, 40, 41, and 42 are DENIED. No further
papers should be filed in this closed case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK
By:

/s/
Deputy Clerk