Polk v. Clark County et al

Filing 44

ORDER - Plaintiff's motions ECF Nos. 39 , 40 , 41 , and 42 are DENIED. No further papers should be filed in this closed case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 8/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RENARD POLK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CLARK COUNTY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________ ) PRESENT: 3:08-CV-0134-LRH (VPC) MINUTES OF THE COURT August 17, 2017 THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: On December 24, 2008, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint and ordered that plaintiff be permitted to proceed only as to Count IV against defendant Kavcos (ECF No. 12). The U.S. Marshal attempted service on Scott Kavcos but was unsuccessful and the summons was returned unexecuted (ECF No. 23). Therefore, the District Court dismissed this lone remaining defendant, Scott Kavcos, without prejudice (ECF No. 24). Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal in August 2009 (ECF No. 25). The Ninth Circuit affirmed the District Court’s decision in April 2015 (ECF No. 35). This matter was then concluded in its entirety. Therefore, plaintiff’s motions ECF Nos. 39, 40, 41, and 42 are DENIED. No further papers should be filed in this closed case. IT IS SO ORDERED. DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK By: /s/ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?