Sells v. McDaniel et al

Filing 81

ORDER granting 39 Motion for Preliminary Injunction.; adopting Report and Recommendations re 64 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Brian E. Sandoval on 07/15/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LG)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNI ED STATES DI TR I T CO U RT T SC DI TR I T O F NEVADA SC 8 W ILI M CATO SEL S, R. LA LJ, 9 F 3 litf ér i , llf l 0 v. lE l K.MCDANI L, a. E et I, I 2 D ef nd n s. e at 1 3 . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 3: 8- V- 7O- ES- AM OC 1 B R ORDER 1 4 Bef r t e Cour i t e Repor and Recom m endaton oft e Unied St t s M agitat oe h ts h t i h t ae sr e l J d e ( 6 )(Rec m m e d t n' e t r d o Ap i 9,20 9,i whih t e Ma ita e Ju ge 5 ug #4 ' o I n a i ' n e e n rl o) 0n ch g sr t d 1 r c m m e ds t att i Cour gr n plit f Mot n f ra Pr l iar Ij n t n ( 39) No 6 eo n h hs t a t a n i' fs i o o ei n y nu ci # m o I obec in t t e Rep r an Re om m en a in ha b enfld. 7 j t oh o ot d c dt o se i e . 1 8 1 D l cussl N . s o 1 9 Thi Cour d ay accept rj c ,or modi , i whol or i par, t e f digs or s t' m , ee t fn y e n th in n 2 rc mmen at n madeb t ema itat .28U. . . 6 6( )1.Futeru d r28U. . . 0 eo dis o y h gsr e' S C j 3 b( ) rh , n e SC 2l ç63 ( )1)iap dymak satmel obe t nt t ema itat j dge' r c m men a in,t en 6 b ( ,f a e i y j c i o h g sr e u s e o o dt h o 22 t i Coud i r quied t ' ake a de novo det r iaton oft os podinsoft e repod and hs s e r ol m em n i he o hr 2 r c m men a in t whc obeci ni made.l Nev rhees ,he sat t d esn t' qui l 3 eo d t ) o ih j to s o ' ' e t l s t t u e o o 'e r ) re 2 so e Is er e iw b (hsCou twh nn ob e t nsar fld. Thoma v. n, 4 U. 140, 4 m e s r ve y t i r) e o j c i o ei ' e' s Ar 47 S 25 1 9 50 ( 9 5) I sea , dert e sat t , hi Coud i n tr qur d t c n uc d nyr viw 4 - 1 8 . n t d un h t ue t s s o e ie o o d t' e e a . 2 a al . . any is e t a i n tt e su j c o anobec in. L= at149. Si iary,t e Ni t 6 t I . of s u h t s o h be t f j t 'd o' mll h nh . 27 28 1F adrcmmnai .8U... 6 6b() ) n eo edtn2 SC j b ()1( . o C o ano jcint bet ey ap rymus s rea dfeiwk i 1 da saf rb igs we wl temagsrt Jdg ' rp r r be t o i l a t t ev n i t t n 0 y t en e d t h o m l h e h itae u es e o t l l Cic ih sr c g ie t at dititc ud i n tr qui dt r ve a magitat j dgesr p r r ut a e o nz d h a src o s o e r o e iw e sr e u ' e o t 2 an r c m menda inwh r n obe t nsh v b enfld. Unt dSt t sv. v a Ta i , deo t o e e o j c i a e e i See i o e e ae Re n - na 3 3 8 F. d 11 4 ( t Ci. 03)( ir ga dig t e sand r ofr ve emply d b t e ditit 2 3 1 9 h r 20 ds e r n h t a d e iw o e y h sr c 4 c ulwh n r viwig a r p d an r c m m en a i nt whc n obec inswer mad l s e o r e e e n e o d eo d to o ih o j t o e e; e 5 as Sc m itv.J hnson ,263 F. u p.2 1 1 ,1 26 ( .Ar .2003)(ea ig t e Nit lo h d o te sp d 29 2 D i z r dn h nh 6 Cicui' deci i n i Revna-r ni as adoptng t e vi w t atdititcours ar notr quied t r ts so n -a a iheh s rc te ero 7 r viw ' n is e t ati n tt e s bec o an obeci n.) Thu ,it er i no o j ci nt a e e a y su h s o h uj t f j to '. s f h e s ' be t o o 8 ma ita ej d e' r c m m en a in,he t i Cour ma ac ep t e r c m m en a inwi ou gs r t u g s e o d t t n hs o t y c th e o dt ott h 9 r ve .Seee. .J hn t n , F. u p 2 a 1 2 ( c ep ig, t ou r ve , ma ita e e iw n . o so e 263 s p . d t 2 6 a c tn wi t e iw a gs r t h 1 j d e' r c m m en a i nt whih n obe t nwa fld) 0 u g s eo d to o c o j c i o si . e 1I I t i case,def ndant have notfld an obecton t t e Magitat Judge' Repod n hs e s i e j i oh sr e s 1 an Rec m men a in. Al ou h n obeci nwasfe , hsCour h s r viwed t e Repod 2d o dt o t g o jt h o i d ti l ta e e h 1 an Rec m mend t n ( 64) an ac ep si Ac or igl, 3do a i # , d c t t c dn y o . 1 4 1 6 I I HEREBY ORDERED t atpaitf Mo i n f ra Pr l iar lj n t n ( 3 )i TS h l n i ' to o fs ei n y nu ci # 9 s m o I I SO O R D E R E D . TS 1 G RA NTED . 5 . I 7 l 8 1 9 DATED:Thi 15t day ofJul ,2009. sh y 20 ' / , . - *y .' - X - f' ' . 21 22 23 24 25 UN TED STATES DI TRI T JUDG E SC 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?