Gordon v. Adams et al

Filing 85

JUDGMENT: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment is hereby entered in accordance with Order filed and entered on June 18, 2010, Court Docket (# 84 ); plaintiffs motion to re-tax costs (Doc. # 71 ) is GRANTED in-part and DENIED in-part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant is entitled to $3,643.05 in costs as the prevailing party in this action. Signed by Lance S. Wilson, Clerk on 7/28//10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - BLG)

AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

r

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
***** ROSE GORDON DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Plaintiff, V.

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
CASE NUMBER: 3:08-cv-00200-LRH-RAM

MARK ADAMS and AMANDA ADAMS, Defendants.

XX Decision by Court. This action came to be considered before the Court. The issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment is hereby entered in accordance with Order filed and entered on June 18, 2010, Court Docket (#84); plaintiff's motion to re-tax costs (Doc. #71) is GRANTED in-part and DENIED in-part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant is entitled to $3,643.05 in costs as the prevailing party in this action.

July 28, 2010