Bullion Monarch Mining, Inc. v. Newmont USA Limited

Filing 118

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's 89 Motion to Sever Claims Against Barrick Goldstrike Mines is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 08/26/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 P ARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER Prepared and Submitted by: PARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER Michael R. Kealy (Nevada Bar No. 0971) 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 750 Reno, NV 89501 Telephone: (775) 323-1601 Facsimile: (775) 348-7250 Francis M. Wikstrom (Utah Bar No. 3462; admitted pro hac vice) Michael P. Petrogeorge (Utah Bar No. 8870; admitted pro hac vice) Brandon J. Mark (Utah Bar No. 10439; admitted pro hac vice) One Utah Center 201 South Main Street, Suite 1800 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Telephone: (801) 536-6700 Facsimile: (801) 536-6111 Email: ecf@parsonsbehle.com Attorneys for Defendants Barrick Goldstrike Mines Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA BULLION MONARCH MINING, INC., Bullio n Monarch, v. NEWMONT USA LTD., et al., Defendants. // // Case No. CV-N-08-00227-ECR-VPC [PROSPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SEVER CLAIMS AGAINST BARRICK GOLDSTRIKE MINES Based on Plaintiff's Motion to Sever Claims Against Barrick Goldstrike Mines (Dkt. #89), Defendant Barrick Goldstrike Mines, Inc.'s Concurrence in Plaintiff's Motion to Sever Pursuant to Rule 21 (Dkt. #90), and Defendant Newmont USA Limited's Non-Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Sever Claims Against Barrick Goldstrike Mines (Dkt. #96), and good cause appearing therefor, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 P ARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion is granted. IT IS SO ORDERED: ____________________________________ August 26, 2009 DATED: ____________ Case No. 3:08-cv-00227-ECR-VPC -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?