Stoffels et al v. GRP Financial Services, Corp. et al
Filing
235
ORDERED that the parties shall have 7 additional days within which to comply with # 232 Order. If they fail to do so, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 3/16/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7 FRANK STOFFELS and KAREN STOFFELS, )
)
8
Plaintiffs,
)
)
9 vs.
)
)
10 DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC.; SELECT )
PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.;
)
11 SIGNATURE GROUP HOLDINGS p/k/a
)
FREMONT REORGANIZING CORP. p/k/a
)
12 FREMONT INVESTMENT AND LOAN BREA
)
CALIFORNIA; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
)
13 REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; SLM
)
CORPORATION a/k/a SALLIE MAE; and )
14 DOES I through X,
)
)
15
Defendants.
)
)
16
)
3:08-CV-00468-ECR-GWF
Order
17
18
On February 29, 2012, we ordered (#232) the parties to file their
19 proposed pretrial orders within fourteen (14) days, alternatively permitting
20 Defendants to dismiss the remaining counterclaim for equitable subrogation
21 which would close the case.
22
The parties have failed to comply with the order (#232) in any respect.
23 This is the second time they have failed to file their respective proposed
24 pretrial orders.
25
26
IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall have
27 seven (7) additional days within which to comply with the order
28
1 (#232).
If they fail to do so a third time, the action will be
2 dismissed without prejudice.
3
4
5
6 DATED: March 16, 2012.
7
____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?