Stoffels et al v. GRP Financial Services, Corp. et al

Filing 235

ORDERED that the parties shall have 7 additional days within which to comply with # 232 Order. If they fail to do so, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 3/16/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 7 FRANK STOFFELS and KAREN STOFFELS, ) ) 8 Plaintiffs, ) ) 9 vs. ) ) 10 DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC.; SELECT ) PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.; ) 11 SIGNATURE GROUP HOLDINGS p/k/a ) FREMONT REORGANIZING CORP. p/k/a ) 12 FREMONT INVESTMENT AND LOAN BREA ) CALIFORNIA; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC ) 13 REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; SLM ) CORPORATION a/k/a SALLIE MAE; and ) 14 DOES I through X, ) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) 3:08-CV-00468-ECR-GWF Order 17 18 On February 29, 2012, we ordered (#232) the parties to file their 19 proposed pretrial orders within fourteen (14) days, alternatively permitting 20 Defendants to dismiss the remaining counterclaim for equitable subrogation 21 which would close the case. 22 The parties have failed to comply with the order (#232) in any respect. 23 This is the second time they have failed to file their respective proposed 24 pretrial orders. 25 26 IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall have 27 seven (7) additional days within which to comply with the order 28 1 (#232). If they fail to do so a third time, the action will be 2 dismissed without prejudice. 3 4 5 6 DATED: March 16, 2012. 7 ____________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?