Cox v. Benedetti et al

Filing 104

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 7/29/2011 GRANTING P's 94 Motion for copies. FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk's office shall mail P copies of docket numbers 95, 95-1, 95-2, 95-3, 95-4 within one day of the date of this order. ( specified docs mailed to P 7/29/2011 ) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
STEVE MICHAEL COX,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
JAMES BENEDETTI,
)
et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
PRESENT:

3:08-cv-00502-LRH-VPC

MINUTES OF THE COURT

July 29, 2011
June 21, 2011

THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEPUTY CLERK:

LISA MANN

REPORTER: NONE APPEARING

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is plaintiff’s “motion for court’s clerk(s) to provide plaintiff copies of
documents/exhibits due to delays, denials, etc. of access to photocopying (5-23-11) court order
(#87)” (#94). Defendants did not oppose.
Plaintiff filed a motion for copies of his preliminary opposition to defendants’ summary
judgment motion and exhibits, stating that defendants did not comply with the court’s May 23, 2011
order (#87), which compelled them to direct ESP to provide plaintiff with a ten dollar photocopy
allowance (#94). Defendants did not oppose the motion, but did file a response to plaintiff’s third
request for an extension of time, noting that defendants’ counsel failed to direct ESP to comply with
the court’s order to provide plaintiff with legal supplies (#91, p. 2). Defendants explained that due
to this oversight plaintiff received his legal supplies eight days after the court entered its order, on
June 1, 2011. Id. Plaintiff filed his opposition to defendants’ summary judgment motion on June
9, 2011, along with the instant motion (#95).
While it appears that plaintiff had access to his photocopy allowance in time for the filing
of his opposition, in an abundance of caution, the court directs the clerk’s office to supply plaintiff
with a copy of his opposition and exhibits (#’s 95, 95-1, 95-2, 95-3, 95-4).
IT IS ORDERED that the court grants plaintiff’s motion for copies (#94).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk’s office shall mail plaintiff copies of docket

numbers 95, 95-1, 95-2, 95-3, 95-4 within one day of the date of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:

/s/
Deputy Clerk