Cox v. Benedetti et al

Filing 26

ORDER DENYING as moot P's 23 Motion to hold in abeyance. The # 12 Scheduling order shall remain in full force and effect. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 7/21/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
UNI ED STATES DI TRI T COURT T S C DI TR I T O F N EV A DA S C M I HAEL STEVE COX, C Plitf, an if vs . J M ESBENEDETTI e a. A , t l, Dee dans fn t. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 3:8- V- 5O2- RH ( PC) 0C 0 L V M I UTESOF THE COURT N J l 21 201 uy , 0 PR E SEN T : TH E H O N O R A B LE VA LER I P. O O K E ,U . .M A G I TR A TE J D G E EC S S U D EPU T Y CLERK : LI A M A N N S REPORTER : O N E APPEA R I G N N COUNSEL FOR PETI I NERI ) NONE APPEARI G TO S: N COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTI ) NONE APPEARI G S: N M I U T E O R D E R I C H A M B E R S: N N Pl i tf sm o i n t hol i a e a c c ur' s he ulng or e pendi g r s l ton of a n if to o d n b y n e o ts c d i dr n e ou i mo in a ds re ig( 2 )i DENI D a mo t Th c m pan h sb e s re e ( 1 ) a d to s n ce nn # 3 s E s o . e o li t a e n ce n d # l, n t eOfie oft eAtor e Gene a i r pr s ntng a lde e dant i t i a ton i cudi g M i hae h fc h t ny rl s e e e i 1 fn s n hs ci n l n cl Br w n,Da eCa r l, d Davi Ve t An ans e waslld on be al ofa1 def nda t on M a o v ro l an d s. wr ie hf 1 e ns y 22, 9(/2) Theeor ,teshedulngor er(/ 1 s alrm an i f l f rea defct 200 /1 . rf e h c i d /2 ) h l e i n u l o c n fe . I I SO ORDERED. TS Cox v. Benedetti et al Doc. 26 LA N CE S. I SO N , WL CLERK !!f 7' .. . ' i#i( E( . '8 ) 1i q ; p (F'-.ij 1..'X ! 6'.. :!.( ). l .' z 0. f A .2 )u ). .g r)J s'ph :r ('F cl : $ t!? s. . 1. ) l tpl y k qi g = B y: // s D eput Cl r y ek I I l i l j 7 L7 : . kl 2.21 , ;L : g0 $ t. I u : ., t g771.7.;;l'r..f.y d g.7 ! .,;uy..y j L7 ,.wsj , yr $. . 1''A ? - --.- . .u-= - -- fl' . -. u -7 k' itott1%i'$J, ). ;i J- ..'' . N ; t . Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?