South Fork Band Council of Western Shoshone of Nevada, et al vs U.S Department of Interior, et al

Filing 122

PROTECTIVE ORDER RE 120 Amended Joint Stipulation and Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr. on 9/14/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ)

Download PDF
Case 3:08-cv-00616-LRH-RAM Document 120 Filed 09/09/2009 Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 P ARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA SOUTH FORK BAND COUNCIL OF WESTERN SHOSHONE OF NEVADA; et al., Plaint iffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; et al., Defendants, and BARRICK CORTEZ INC. Defendant-Intervenor. Plaint iffs South Fork Band Council of Western Shoshone of Nevada, Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada, Timbisha Shoshone Tribe, Western Shoshone Defense Project, and Great Basin Resource Watch ("Plaintiffs"), Defendants United States Department of the Interior ("DOI"), United States Bureau of Land Management, Gerald M. Smith, District Manager, Battle Mountain District Office ("Defendants"), and Defendant-Intervenor Barrick Cortez Inc. ("Defendant-Intervenor") stipulate and agree to the following: 1. The parties may produce documents in the course of this litigation that are Case No. 3:08-cv-00616 LRH (RAM) AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER confidential and proprietary and limit disclosure by marking each page of the document with the words "Protected Document." 2. Only the parties' litigation counsel of record and the parties' consultants and/or experts retained by the parties having a need for the information in the performance of their duties in this litigation shall have access to the Protected Documents. 3. The persons who are permitted to receive the Protected Documents shall not use the Protected Documents or their contents, for any purpose other than this litigation and any appeals or subsequent remands. No person who receives, or otherwise has access to, the Protected Case 3:08-cv-00616-LRH-RAM Document 120 Filed 09/09/2009 Page 2 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 P ARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER Documents, or the contents thereof, solely by virtue of their disclosure in this case shall make unauthorized disclosure of them or their content. 4. If any person or party who receives the Protected Documents receives a request, made pursuant to any federal or state law, from any person not subject to this Joint Stipulation or Protective Order for access to, or copies of, any documents provided to the party pursuant to this Joint Stipulation, that person or party shall not provide such access or copies without first providing notice of the request to the party that produced the Protected Documents sufficiently in advance of any disclosure so that the producing party may object or seek a protective order. 5. Any person or party intending to disclose, use, release, or provide to any person or entity any Protected Document by claiming to be in the possession of the Protected Document from a source other than this case must (1) provide notice of its intent to the party that produced the Protected Documents sufficiently in advance of any disclosure so that the producing party may object or seek a protective order, and (2) upon the request of the party that produced the Protected Document, demonstrate how the person or party intending to disclose or otherwise use the Protected Document came to be in possession of that information. Upon receiving the response from the person or party intending to disclose or otherwise use the Protected Document to the request contemplated by number (2) of the preceding sentence, the party that produced the Protected Documents may seek a protective order, and the person or party intending to disclose or otherwise use the Protected Document, or contents thereof, may not do so until the court resolves the motion for a protective order. Any person or party who makes a disclosure of information which is contained in the Protected Documents shall, upon written request by the producing party, promptly identify the independent, publicly available source of the challenged information. Failing or refusing to do so shall be deemed a violation of this Protective Order. 6. The Protected Documents may be disclosed only to the parties' litigation counsel, or persons in the employ of such litigation counsel, or to the parties' consultants and/or experts retained by the parties who have a need for the information in the performance of their duties in -2- Case 3:08-cv-00616-LRH-RAM Document 120 Filed 09/09/2009 Page 3 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 P ARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER this litigation. The Protected Documents shall not be disclosed to the parties or their employees, agents, or members, except as provided herein. 7. Except for the Court and its employees, all individuals having access to the Protected Documents and all individuals to whom these Protected Documents or the information therein are disclosed, other than counsel of record, shall be required to sign a copy of the Acknowledgment of Joint Stipulation form attached hereto as Exhibit A indicating that they have read and agree to abide by the terms of this Joint Stipulation and Protective Order. Counsel of record for each receiving party will send copies of the signed acknowledgment forms to the attorney of record for the producing party. 8. No party or non-party shall file or submit for filing as part of the court record any documents under seal without first obtaining leave of court. Notwithstanding any agreement among the parties, the party seeking to file a paper under seal bears the burden of overcoming the presumption in favor of public access to papers filed in court. If a party wishes to file a Protected Document with the Court and therefore must move to file it under seal, it shall first provide notice of its intent to the party that produced the Protected Document, sufficiently in advance, so that the party that produced the Protected Document may join in the motion to seal. 9. All individuals subject to this Joint Stipulation who have access to the Protected Documents shall return or certify the destruction of any and all such Protected Documents, copies or reproductions, including, without limitation, any partial copies or reproductions, or any transcriptions or hand-written notes regarding the contents of the Protected Documents, in their possession to counsel of record for the producing party within thirty (30) days of the termination of this litigation, including all applicable appeals or remands. This obligation to return or destroy the Protected Documents and content shall occur prior to the termination of this litigation when an individual or entity is no longer a party or when an attorney or expert is no longer retained to work on this case, whichever applies. Individuals returning documents under any circumstance shall certify in writing that the documents, copies and reproductions, in whole or in part, have been returned or have been destroyed. -3- Case 3:08-cv-00616-LRH-RAM Document 120 Filed 09/09/2009 Page 4 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 P ARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER 10. Any receiving party may challenge the designation of a document as a Protected Document or request that a Protected Document be disclosed to a person not contemplated by this Joint Stipulation. In such case, counsel shall confer in good faith in an attempt to resolve the issue. If they are unsuccessful, the issue will be presented to the Court. Unless and until the Court determines that the document is not entitled to the protected designation or that a Protected Document may be disclosed to an additional person (subject to compliance with paragraph 7, above), the receiving party shall treat the document as subject to this Joint Stipulation and Protective Order. 11. This Joint Stipulation and Protective Order does not constitute a ruling on the question of whether any Protected Document is admissible and does not constitute any ruling on any potential objection to the admissibility of any Protected Document. The parties reserve the right to challenge the use or admissibility of any Protected Document. 12. This Joint Stipulation and Protective Order shall survive the termination of this case and is binding for all time without further order of the Court. -4- Case 3:08-cv-00616-LRH-RAM Document 120 Filed 09/09/2009 Page 5 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 P ARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER Dated: September 9, 2009 Respect fully submitted, GREGORY A. BROWER United States Attorney GREG ADDINGTON Assistant United States Attorney Nevada Bar #6875 100 West Liberty St., Suite 600 Reno, NV 89501 (775) 784-5438 (775) 784-5181 ­ facsimile By: /s/ Ty Bair (with permission by Michael R. McCarthy) JOHN C. CRUDEN Act ing Assistant Attorney General SARA E. COSTELLO Trial Attorney TY BAIR United States Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Natural Resources Section P.O. Box 663 Washington D.C. 20044-0663 (202) 305-0476 ­ phone (202 305-0506 ­ facsimile Attorneys for Defendants By: /s/ Roger Flynn (with permission by Michael R. McCarthy) HENRY EGGHART, Nevada Bar No. 3401 630 East Plumb Lane Reno, NV 89502 (775) 333-5282 (303) 823-4732 ­ facsimile ROGER FLYNN JEFFREY C. PARSONS WESTERN ACTION MINING PROJECT P.O. Box 349 440 Main Street, #2 Lyo ns, CO 80540 (303) 823-5738 (303) 823-5732 ­ facsimile Attorneys for Plaintiffs By: /s/ Michael R. McCarthy JIM B. BUTLER, Nevada Bar No. 8389 MICHAEL R. McCARTHY, Nevada Bar No. 9345 FRANCIS M. WIKSTROM, Utah Bar No. 3462 MICHAEL L. LARSEN, Utah Bar No. 4069 PARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER 333 Holcomb Ave. Reno, NV 89501 (775) 323-1601 (775) 348-7250 ­ facsimile -5- Case 3:08-cv-00616-LRH-RAM Document 120 Filed 09/09/2009 Page 6 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 P ARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER 201 South Main Street, Suite 1800 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 (801) 532-1234 (801) 536-6111 ­ facsimile Attorneys for Defendant-Intervenor 14th The Court hereby APPROVED this Joint Stipulation and it is SO ORDERED, this ____ September day of _______________, 2009. UNI RY STATES LARTEDR. HICKS MAGISTRATE JUDGE United States District Court Judge -6- Case 3:08-cv-00616-LRH-RAM Document 120 Filed 09/09/2009 Page 7 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 P ARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on September 9, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of such filing to the following: Henry Egghart, Nevada Bar No. 3401 630 East Plumb Lane Reno, NC 89502 Telephone: (775) 333-5282 Facsimile: (303) 823-5732 Email: hegghart@nvbell.net Roger Flynn (pro hac vice) Jeffrey C. Parsons (pro hac vice) WESTERN ACTION MINING PROJECT P.O. Box 349 440 Main Street, #2 Lyo ns, CO 80540 Telephone: (303) 823-5738 Facsimile: (303) 823-5732 Email: wmap@igc.org Attorneys for Plaintiffs Ty Bair Trial Attorney Sara E. Costello, Trial Attorney Trial Attorney United States Department of Justice Environmental & Natural Resources Division General Litigation Section P.O. Box 663 Washington, D.C., 20044-0663 Telephone: (202) 305-0476 Facsimile: (202) 305-0506 Email: tyler.bair@usdoj.gov sara.costello@usdoj.gov Gregory A. Bower United States Attorney Greg Addington Nevada Bar No. 6875 Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office 100 West Liberty Street Suite 600 Reno, NV 89501 Telephone: (775) 784-5438 Facsimile: (775) 784-5181 Attorneys for Federal Defendants /s/ Michael R. McCarthy 4846-8272-1796.5 1 Case 3:08-cv-00616-LRH-RAM Document 120-2 Filed 09/09/2009 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 P ARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER Exhibit A 4846-1054-3620.1 Case 3:08-cv-00616-LRH-RAM Document 120-2 Filed 09/09/2009 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 P ARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA SOUTH FORK BAND COUNCIL OF WESTERN SHOSHONE OF NEVADA; et al., Plaint iffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; et al., Defendants, and BARRICK CORTEZ INC. Defendant-Intervenor. I, ___________________________, hereby acknowledge that I have read and understand the _____________, 2009 Joint Stipulation and Protective Order ("Protective Order"), which pertains to Protected Documents marked as such. I hereby agree to be bound by the terms of the Joint Stipulation and Protective Order. Specifically, I agree to following: 1. I agree that I will use the Protected Documents disclosed to me only as permitted Case No. 3:08-cv-00616 LRH (RAM) ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF JOINT STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER by the Joint Stipulation and Protective Order and only for purposes of this litigation including any appeals and not for any other purpose; 2. I agree that any Protected Documents disclosed to me in this case, as well as all copies thereof or notes referring to them, will be destroyed or returned to counsel for the producing party within thirty (30) days after the termination of my work on this case or the termination of this litigation, including any appeals, whichever comes earlier; 3. 4. I agree that I will abide by all terms of the Joint Stipulation and Protective Order; I hereby confirm that my duties under the Joint Stipulation and Protective Order are continuing and shall survive the termination of this case; and 4846-1054-3620.1 Case 3:08-cv-00616-LRH-RAM Document 120-2 Filed 09/09/2009 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 P ARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER 5. I hereby subject myself to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada for the purpose of enforcing my obligations hereunder. Dated: __________________________ (Signature) (Printed Name) 4846-1054-3620.1 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?