Steinhauer v. McDaniel et al

Filing 24

ORDER granting 22 respondents' Motion to Extend Time to file and serve an answer or other response to 12 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and granting 23 respondents' Motion to Extend Time to file and serve a response to 17 petit ioner's MOTION for District Judge to Reconsider 10 Order. Answers to 12 Petition due 6/29/2009. Responses to 17 motion for reconsideration are due by 5/22/2009. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 5/19/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _________________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Respondents have submitted a Motion for Enlargement of Time (First Request) (#22), in which they ask for additional time to respond to the Petition (#10), and a Motion for Enlargement of Time (Second Request) (#23), in which they ask for additional time to respond to Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (#17). Good cause appearing; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondents' Motion for Enlargement of Time (First Request) (#22) is GRANTED. Respondents shall have through June 29, 2009, to file and serve an answer or other response to the Petition (#12). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents' Motion for Enlargement of Time (Second Request) (#23) is GRANTED. Respondents shall have through May 22, 2009, to file and serve a response to Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (#17). DATED this 19th day of May, 2009. vs. E. K. MCDANIEL, et al., Respondents. DAVID MICHAEL STEINHAUER, Petitioner, Case No. 3:08-CV-00619-LRH-(VPC) ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?