Bill Adamson et al. Vs. USA

Filing 445

ORDER - The following motions are DENIED without prejudice subject to their reinstatement by the court in the due course of the aforementioned proceedings: Uhouse v. Bureau of Reclamation , 3:08-cv-0285-LDG : Plaintiffs' motio n to reconsider the magistrate judges order denying plaintiffs' motion to enforce settlement (#428) Adamson v. United States , 3:08-cv-0621-LDG : Motion for summary judgment as to ten specific claims (# 212 ) Moore v. U nited States , 3:09-cv-0167-LDG : Motion to set date for trial (#215) Adgett v. United States , 3:09-cv-0649-LDG : Motion for summary judgment as to ten specific claims (#147), and Motion to set a date for trial (#157) A damson v. United States , 3:09-cv-0715-LDG : Motion for summary judgment as to ten specific claims (#149), and Renewed motion to dismiss claims of 168 enumerated plaintiffs as untimely (#166) Ames v. United States , 3:10-cv-0463-LDG : Motion to set a date for trial (#108) Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 3/27/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) Modified on 3/28/2013 to correct file date (DRM).

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7

JUDY KROSHUS, et al.,

8

Plaintiffs,

9

v.

10

3:08-cv-0246-LDG-RAM
(Kroshus I)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

11

Defendants.

12

ALICIA UHOUSE, et al.,

13

Plaintiffs,

14

v.

15

3:08-cv-0285-LDG-RAM

THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
THE INTERIOR, et al.,

16

Defendants.

17

BILL ADAMSON, et al.,

3:08-cv-0621-LDG-RAM
(Adamson I)

18
Plaintiffs,
19
v.
20
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
21
Defendant.
22
23
24
25
26
1

1

LARRY J. MOORE, et al.,

2

Plaintiffs,

3

v.

4

3:09-cv-0167-LDG-RAM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

5

Defendants.

6
7

JAMES ADGETT, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

8
9
10

3:09-cv-0649-LDG-RAM

v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.

11

JUDY KROSHUS, et al.,

3:09-cv-0713-LDG-RAM
(Kroshus II)

12
Plaintiffs,
13
v.
14
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16

BILL ADAMSON, et al.,

17
18
19

3:09-cv-0715-LDG-RAM
(Adamson II)

Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

20

Defendant.

21

JASON AMES, et al.,

22

Plaintiffs,

23

v.

24

3:10-cv-0463-LDG-RAM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

25

Defendant.

26
2

1
2

In conformity with the previously announced subdivision of pending motions, and in the
further interests of case management of this litigation,

3

THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that the following motions are DENIED without

4

prejudice subject to their reinstatement by the court in the due course of the aforementioned

5

proceedings:

6
Uhouse v. Bureau of Reclamation, 3:08-cv-0285-LDG
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider the magistrate judge’s order denying plaintiffs’
motion to enforce settlement (#428)
Adamson v. United States, 3:08-cv-0621-LDG
Motion for summary judgment as to ten specific claims (#212)
Moore v. United States, 3:09-cv-0167-LDG
Motion to set date for trial (#215)
Adgett v. United States, 3:09-cv-0649-LDG

14

Motion for summary judgment as to ten specific claims (#147)

15

Motion to set a date for trial (#157)

16

Adamson v. United States, 3:09-cv-0715-LDG

17

Motion for summary judgment as to ten specific claims (#149)

18

Renewed motion to dismiss claims of 168 enumerated plaintiffs as untimely (#166)

19

Ames v. United States, 3:10-cv-0463-LDG

20

Motion to set a date for trial (#108)

21
22

DATED this ______ day of March, 2013.

23
24

______________________________
Lloyd D. George
United States District Judge

25
26
3