Edwards v. Copenhaver

Filing 13

JUDGMENT : Copenhaver's 5 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. FURTHER ORD that Edwards' 9 Motion to File Response to Defendant Reply and Opposition is DENIED as moot. FURTHER ORD that Edwards' 11 Motion to File Out of Time His Reply to Just-Received Defendant "Opposition and Request" is DENIED as moot. FURTHER ORD that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Lance S. Wilson on 8/25/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case r UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ***** ALLAN G. EDWARDS, JR., Plaintiff, V. CASE NUMBER:3:08-CV-00623-LRH-VPC JAMES M. COPENHAVER, Defendant. DISTRICT OF NEVADA JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. X Decision by Court. This action came to be considered before the Court. The issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Copenhaver's Motion to Dismiss (#5) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Edwards' Motion to File Response to Defendant Reply and Opposition (#9) is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Edwards' Motion to File Out of Time His Reply to Just-Received Defendant "Opposition and Request" (#11) is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. August 25, 2009 LANCE S. WILSON Clerk D. R. Morgan Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?