The Housing Authority of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians et al v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al

Filing 45

ORDERED that the clerk of court shall enter JUDGMENT in favor of plaintiff the Housing Authority of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians and against defendants United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD"); Julian Castro, Secretary of HUD; and Jemine Bryon, General Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Office of Public and Indian Housing, in this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants shall restore to plaintiff the amount of $769,645.0 0, for Indian Housing Block Grant funds. (See pdf order for additional specifics. ) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants shall make restoration of the IHBG funds from all available sources as specified herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the resto ration of funds to plaintiff shall be completed as soon as administratively feasible, but in no event later than 24 months from the date of judgment. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/28/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 *** ) THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE ) TE-MOAK TRIBE OF WESTERN ) SHOSHONE INDIANS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ) HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT; ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 3:08-CV-0626-LRH-VPC ORDER 16 17 The court has reviewed the parties’ March 21, 2016 joint status report (Doc. #441) and finds 18 that judgment in favor of plaintiff the Housing Authority of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western 19 Shoshone Indians (“Te-Moak Housing Authority”) and against defendants United States 20 Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”); Julian Castro, Secretary of HUD; and 21 Jemine Bryon, General Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Office of Public and Indian Housing, is 22 warranted in this action based on the court’s prior rulings (Doc. ##26, 39) and the parties’ 23 agreement. 24 25 The only issue remaining in this action is the determination of whether or not the court can order restoration of the $769,645.00 in recaptured funds. Defendants contend that the court is 26 1 Refers to the court’s docket number. 1 without authority under the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq., to order 2 restoration of the recaptured funds to the Te-Moak Housing Authority as the funds have already 3 been disbursed to other tribes. See Doc. ##23, 44. The court disagrees. 4 The court has reviewed the documents and pleadings on file in this matter and finds that the 5 court can order restoration of the recaptured funds through future block grant funds. See Fort Peck 6 Hous. Auth. v. HUD (Fort Peck II), Civil Action No. 05-cv-0018-RPM, 2014 U.S. DIST LEXIS 7 108123, *9-10 (D. Colo., Aug. 6, 2014) (ordering restoration of recaptured funds through regular 8 block grant funds). 9 10 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the clerk of court shall enter JUDGMENT in favor of 11 plaintiff the Housing Authority of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians and against 12 defendants United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”); Julian Castro, 13 Secretary of HUD; and Jemine Bryon, General Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Office of Public 14 and Indian Housing, in this action. 15 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants shall restore to plaintiff the amount of 16 $769,645.00, for Indian Housing Block Grant funds. Any such restoration shall be in addition to the 17 full Indian Housing Block Grant allocation that would otherwise be due to the plaintiff under the 18 Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination ACT in a given fiscal year as 19 calculated without application of the amount of the judgment. 20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants shall make restoration of the IHBG funds 21 from all available sources, including, but not limited to, Indian Housing Block Grant funds carried 22 forward from previous grant years and Indian Housing Block Grant funds appropriated in future 23 grant years. 24 /// 25 /// 26 2 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the restoration of funds to plaintiff shall be completed as 2 soon as administratively feasible, but in no event later than twenty-four (24) months from the date 3 of judgment. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 DATED this 28th day of March, 2016. 6 7 __________________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?