Walker River Paiute Tribe et al v. United States Departmet of Housing and Urban Development et al

Filing 37

ORDERED that the parties shall until 11/28/2013 to file a supplemental brief of not more than 10 pages in accordance with this order. The parties shall then have 10 days to file a response brief of not more than 5 pages. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/13/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 *** ) WALKER RIVER PAIUTE TRIBE; et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ) HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT; ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 3:08-cv-0627-LRH-VPC ORDER 15 16 Before the court is defendants’ notice of supplemental authority. Doc. #36. In their notice, 17 defendants provided the court a copy of the August 8, 2013 decision in Fort Belknap Hous. Dep’t v. 18 Office of Pub. & Indian Hous., 726 F.3d 1099 (9th Cir. 2013). The court has reviewed the Fort 19 Belknap decision and finds that supplemental briefing by the parties is necessary to address the 20 jurisdictional issues raised in that decision and how they impact the court’s subject matter 21 jurisdiction in the present action. Fort Belknap held that the district court did not have subject matter jurisdiction over the 22 23 underlying action under § 4161(d) of the Native American Housing Assistance and Self 24 Determination Act (“NAHASDA”) because no action was taken pursuant to § 4161 of that act. 726 25 F.3d at 1104. Similar challenges have been raised in the present case concerning whether 26 /// 1 defendants complied with the requisite provisions of § 4161.1 Thus, the court is concerned with 2 whether or not it may exercise subject matter jurisdiction over these challenges in the present 3 action. Accordingly, the court shall grant the parties leave to file brief supplemental briefing on the 4 issue of subject matter jurisdiction as it relates to the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in 5 Fort Belknap. 6 7 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties shall have fifteen (15) days from entry of 8 this order to file a supplemental brief of not more than ten (10) pages in accordance with this order. 9 The parties shall then have ten (10) days to file a response brief of not more than five (5) pages. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 DATED this 13th day of November, 2013. 12 13 __________________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 The court recognizes that there are several other constitutional challenges in this action for which the court may exercise jurisdiction independently of those challenges raised under § 4161. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?