Conner vs Harrah's Operating Company, Inc. et al
Filing
105
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Extend Time 100 is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have fifteen days to respond to the Motion to Reconsider 99 from the date this Court spreads the mandate on its records. Harrah's shall have the standard time to reply. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 5/30/2012.) Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/15/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
WILLIAM H. CONNER,
9
Plaintiff,
10
vs.
11
HARRAH’S OPERATING CO., INC. et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
3:08-cv-00633-RCJ-WGC
ORDER
This case arises out of an alleged conspiracy between Harrah’s Operating Co., Inc.
15
(“Harrah’s”) and three employees of the Nevada Gaming Control Board to recover an
16
overpayment made to a gambler, Plaintiff William Conner. The Court granted summary
17
judgment on all claims except those arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and denied qualified
18
immunity to the individual Defendants. The Court of Appeals reversed the denial of qualified
19
immunity. The mandate has not yet issued, but the remaining Defendant, Harrah’s, has asked the
20
Court to reconsider granting it summary judgment on the sole remaining claim against it for
21
§ 1983 conspiracy based upon the Court of Appeals’ ruling. Also pending before the Court is
22
Plaintiff’s motion for fifteen days to respond to the motion to reconsider, starting from the date
23
the Court spreads the mandate upon its records.
24
///
25
///
1
2
CONCLUSION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Extend Time (ECF No. 100) is
3
GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have fifteen days to respond to the Motion to Reconsider (ECF No.
4
99) from the date this Court spreads the mandate on its records. Harrah’s shall have the standard
5
time to reply.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 15th day of May, 2012.
8
9
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?