Conner vs Harrah's Operating Company, Inc. et al

Filing 105

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Extend Time 100 is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have fifteen days to respond to the Motion to Reconsider 99 from the date this Court spreads the mandate on its records. Harrah's shall have the standard time to reply. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 5/30/2012.) Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/15/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 WILLIAM H. CONNER, 9 Plaintiff, 10 vs. 11 HARRAH’S OPERATING CO., INC. et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 3:08-cv-00633-RCJ-WGC ORDER This case arises out of an alleged conspiracy between Harrah’s Operating Co., Inc. 15 (“Harrah’s”) and three employees of the Nevada Gaming Control Board to recover an 16 overpayment made to a gambler, Plaintiff William Conner. The Court granted summary 17 judgment on all claims except those arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and denied qualified 18 immunity to the individual Defendants. The Court of Appeals reversed the denial of qualified 19 immunity. The mandate has not yet issued, but the remaining Defendant, Harrah’s, has asked the 20 Court to reconsider granting it summary judgment on the sole remaining claim against it for 21 § 1983 conspiracy based upon the Court of Appeals’ ruling. Also pending before the Court is 22 Plaintiff’s motion for fifteen days to respond to the motion to reconsider, starting from the date 23 the Court spreads the mandate upon its records. 24 /// 25 /// 1 2 CONCLUSION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Extend Time (ECF No. 100) is 3 GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have fifteen days to respond to the Motion to Reconsider (ECF No. 4 99) from the date this Court spreads the mandate on its records. Harrah’s shall have the standard 5 time to reply. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 15th day of May, 2012. 8 9 _____________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?