Ellis v. Benedetti et al
Filing
182
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 5/14/2012. By Deputy Clerk: Katie Ogden. Defendants' 102 Motion to Seal is GRANTED with respect to Exhibits E-1, F-1, and H-1. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
HOWARD ELLIS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JAMES BENEDETTI, et. al.
Defendants.
PRESENT:
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
3:08-cv-00657-ECR (WGC)
MINUTE ORDER
May 14, 2012
THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:
KATIE OGDEN
REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is Defendants’ Motion to File Exhibits in Support of Motion to
Dismiss Under Seal. (Doc. # 102.) Specifically, Defendants seek to file Exhibits E, F,
and H, in support of their Motion to Dismiss under seal. (Id.) Exhibit E is an Unusual
Incident Report containing Plaintiff’s medical information. (Id.) Exhibit F is a
Memorandum from Richard D. Long, M.D. (Id.) Exhibit H is an Offender Information
Summary. (Id.) Defendants subsequently filed a supplement to their motion. (Doc. #
120) in which they file a declaration in support of their motion and replace Exhibits E, F,
and H, with Exhibits E-1, F-1, and H-1. (Id.)
“Historically, courts have recognized a general right to inspect and copy public
records and documents, including judicial records and documents.” See Kamakana v.
City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation
marks and citation omitted). Documents that have been traditionally kept secret,
including grand jury transcripts and warrant materials in a pre-indictment
investigation, come within an exception to the general right of public access. See id.
Otherwise, “a strong presumption in favor of access is the starting point.” Id. (internal
quotation marks and citation omitted).
///
MINUTES OF THE COURT
3:08-cv-00657-ECR (WGC)
Date: May 14, 2012
Page 2
A motion to seal documents that are part of the judicial record, or filed in
connection with a dispositive motion, as they are here, must meet the “compelling
reasons” standard outlined in Kamakana. Thus, a party seeking to seal judicial records
must show that “compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings...outweigh
the general history of access and the public policies favoring disclosure.” Kamakana,
447 F.3d at 1178-79. The trial court must weigh relevant factors including “the public
interest in understanding the judicial process and whether disclosure of the material
could result in improper use of the material for scandalous or libelous purposes or
infringement upon trade secrets.” Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 679
n. 6 (9th Cir. 2010) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). While the decision
to grant or deny a motion to seal is within the trial court’s discretion, the trial court must
articulate its reasoning in deciding a motion to seal. Pintos, 605 F.3d at 679.
The court recognizes that the need to protect medical privacy has qualified as a
“compelling reason,” for sealing records. See, e.g., San Ramon Regional Med. Ctr., Inc.
v. Principal Life Ins. Co., 2011 WL89931, at *n.1 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2011); Abbey v.
Hawaii Employers Mut. Ins. Co., 2010 WL4715793, at * 1-2 (D. HI. Nov. 15, 2010); G.
v. Hawaii, 2010 WL 267483, at *1-2 (D.HI. June 25, 2010); Wilkins v. Ahern, 2010
WL3755654 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 24, 2010); Lombardi v. TriWest Healthcare Alliance
Corp., 2009 WL 1212170, at * 1 (D.Ariz. May 4, 2009).
With respect to Exhibit H-1, Plaintiff’s Offender Information Summary, the court
is aware that these types of records contain highly sensitive and confidential information
which if disclosed, could undermine the safety and security of the plaintiff inmate, other
inmates, correctional staff, and the general public.
The court finds that “compelling reasons” exist for keeping Exhibits E-1, F-1 and
H-1 under seal. Defendants’ motion is GRANTED with respect to Exhibits E-1, F-1 and
H-1 .
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By: /s/
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?