Cox v. Palmer et al

Filing 126

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Motion Hearing held on 12/6/2010 before Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr. Crtrm Administrator: Jennifer Cotter; Pla Counsel: Michael Steve Cox, In Pro Per (telephonically); Def Counsel: Crystal Willis ; FTR #: 1:30:27 p.m. - 2:01:40 p.m.; Courtroom: 2.Warden McDaniel and Dr. Kane are also present telephonically. 109 Motion for Stay of Proceedings is DENIED; 111 Motion for Retroactive Issuance of Legal Supplies is DENIED; 125 Motion to Compel / for Sanctions is DENIED. Please see attached minutes for details. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

Cox v. Palmer et al

Doc. 126

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RENO, NEVADA MICHAEL STEVE COX, Plaintiff(s), vs. J. PALMER, et al., Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:08-CV-0663-ECR-RAM MINUTES OF THE COURT DATED: DECEMBER 6, 2010

PRESENT: HONORABLE ROBERT A. McQUAID, JR., U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Deputy Clerk: JENNIFER COTTER Reporter: FTR: 1:30:27 p.m. - 2:01:40 p.m.

Counsel for Plaintiff(s): MICHAEL STEVE COX, In Pro Per (telephonically) Counsel for Defendant(s): CRYSTAL WILLIS Warden McDaniel and Dr. Kane are also in attendance telephonically PROCEEDINGS: MOTION HEARING 1:30 p.m. Court convenes. The Court addresses and hears argument as to each of the subject motions. Motion for 30-Day Stay of Proceedings (Docket #109) IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Stay of Proceedings is DENIED. The case will proceed as follows: Plaintiff shall be allowed to view his medical records within ten (10) days, and Ely State Prison shall provide the assistance he needs in order to do so. He shall tag those documents he wants copied and copies shall be made and held for the purpose of attaching them to his opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket #93). Plaintiff shall then have until January 21, 2011 to file his opposition. Motion for Retroactive Issuance of October's Legal Supplies (Docket #111) The Court finds that Plaintiff has received all of the legal supplies he is entitled to and has not shown extraordinary need to be provided with more. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Retroactive Issuance of Legal Supplies is DENIED.

Dockets.Justia.com

Page Two 3:08-CV-0663-ECR-RAM (Cox v. Palmer, et al.) Minutes December 6, 2010 Motion to Compel / for Sanctions (Docket #125) The Court feels that no party has been damaged by the delay in this case and assures Plaintiff that he is not seen as the cause of any delay. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Compel / for Sanctions is DENIED. 2:01 p.m. Court adjourns. LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK By: /s/ Deputy Clerk