Cox v. Palmer et al

Filing 160

MINUTE ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's # 151 Report andRecommendation. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' # 93 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the # 151 Report and Recommendation is adopted and P's # 112 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is denied as moot; # 123 Motion to Seal is denied as moot; # 131 Motion to Expunge is denied as moot; and # 144 Motion for Clarification or in the alternative TRO is denied as moot. The C ourt notes that the Magistrate Judge entered an Order (# 158 ) allowing Ds an enlargement of time to respond to P's # 153 Motion for Sanctions and Request for Ambulatory Assistance (#153). The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 9/12/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
RENO, NEVADA
MICHAEL STEVE COX,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
J. PALMER,
)
)
Defendant.
)
________________________________________)
PRESENT:
Deputy Clerk:

3:08-cv-00663-ECR-RAM
MINUTES OF THE COURT
DATE: September 12, 2011

EDWARD C. REED, JR.
COLLEEN LARSEN

U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Reporter:

NONE APPEARING

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

NONE APPEARING

Counsel for Defendant(s)

NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS
On July 27, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation
(#151) recommending that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (#93), filed
on October 25, 2010, on Plaintiff’s claims of deliberate indifference for
alleged deprivation of medications, a walker, and eye glasses be granted.
Objections (#152) were timely filed to the Report and Recommendation by
Plaintiff on August 11, 2011. Plaintiff’s objections are not well taken and
are overruled.
IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation (#151) is well taken and is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
The
evidence presented in support of the Motion for Summary Judgment indicates
that Plaintiff’s claims for deliberate indifference lack merit. Plaintiff’s
objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation are without
merit.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
(#93), filed on October 25, 2010, is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (#151) is
adopted and Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (#112) is
denied as moot; Motion to Seal (#123) is denied as moot; Motion to Expunge

(#131) is denied as moot; and Motion for Clarification or in the alternative
TRO (#144) is denied as moot.
The Court notes that the Magistrate Judge entered an order allowing
Defendants an enlargement of time to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for
Sanctions and Request for Ambulatory Assistance (#153).
The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By
Cox v. Palmer
3:08-cv-663-ECR-RAM

2

/s/
Deputy Clerk