Cox v. Palmer et al

Filing 176

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's 170 , 173 , 174 Motions are DENIED. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 1/26/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
RENO, NEVADA

4
5
6
MICHAEL STEVE COX,
7
Plaintiff,
8
vs.
9
J. PALMER; et al.,
10
Defendants.
11

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

3:08-cv-00663-ECR-WGC

Order

12
13

On October 7, 2011, the Magistrate Judge entered an Order

14 (#169) denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Subpoena Witnesses (#168).
15 Summary judgment had previously been granted as to all defendants on
16 September 12, 2011 (#160) and judgment was entered in favor of
17 defendants on September 15, 2011 (#161).
18

On October 24, 2011, December 9, 2011, and January 3, 2012,

19 Plaintiff filed motions (## 170, 173, 174) requesting review of the
20 Magistrate Judge’s Order (#169) denying as moot his Motion to
21 Subpoena Witnesses (#168).

Plaintiff has shown no basis to overturn

22 the Magistrate Judge’s Order (#169), and IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that
23 Plaintiff’s Motions (## 170, 173, 174) are DENIED.
24
25
26 DATED: January 26, 2012.
27
28

____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE