McCaskill v. Budge et al

Filing 75

ORDERED that the time for P to respond to Rs' # 74 Motion to dismiss is ADVANCED to March 9, 2012, and that Rs' reply time following the response shall be the standard reply time as set by the local rules. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 2/13/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
8
9

JEREMY DALE MCCASKILL,
Petitioner,

10

3:08-cv-00687-ECR-WGC

11
vs.

ORDER

12
13

MICHAEL BUDGE, et al.,

14

Respondents.

15
16

Following upon respondents’ prompt response in this habeas matter,

17

IT IS ORDERED that the time for petitioner to respond to respondents’ motion (#74)

18

to dismiss is ADVANCED to March 9, 2012, and that respondents’ reply time following the

19

response shall be the standard reply time as set by the local rules.

20
21
22

The Court thereafter will seek to resolve the pending motion as promptly as its docket
allows.
DATED: February 13, 2012.

23
24
25
26
27
28

______________________________________
EDWARD C. REED
United States District Judge