Moulton v. Burger, et al

Filing 42

JUDGMENT - D City of Sparks and Sparks Police Department's Motion to Dismiss (# 37 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Lance S. Wilson on 3/31/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case r UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ***** SHERYL MOULTON, Plaintiff, V. CASE NUMBER: 3:09-CV-00016-RCJ-VPC CITY OF SPARKS, JUDGE KEVIN HIGGINS, both as individual and Sparks Justice Court Judge; JUDGE SUSAN DERISO, both as individual and Sparks Justice Court Judge; SPARKS POLICE DEPARTMENT; WASHOE COUNTY; WASHOE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; EUGENE BURGER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, a California Corporation; EUGENE J. BURGER; KEVIN BERG; JOHN COLEMAN; GAYLE A. KERN, LTD; GAYLE A. KERN; ULLA CHRISTENSEN, both as individual and Lakeside Plaza Board Director; DANIEL JOSEPH, both as individual and Lakeside Plaza Board Directonr; FRANK A. PERAU, both as individual and Lakeside Plaza Board Director; RICH SVIHLA, both as individual and Lakeside Plaza Board Director; MICHAEL S. GRADY, both as individual and Lakeside Plaza Board Director; MARY L. HARRIS, both as individual and Lakeside Plaza Board Director; LAKESIDE PLAZA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION; and DOES 1-500, Defendants. DISTRICT OF NEVADA JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. X Decision by Court. This action came to be considered before the Court. The issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant City of Sparks and Sparks Police Department's Motion to Dismiss (#37) is GRANTED. March 31, 2010 LANCE S. WILSON Clerk D. R. Morgan Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?