Stockmeier v. Baker et al
Filing
61
ORDER ADOPTING 58 Report and Recommendation. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's 55 Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Action is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 02/02/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
1
2
3 4 5
6 7
UNI ED STATES D I T R I T CO U R T T S C D I T R I T O F NEVA DA SC
8 RBR LSO K EEff O ET .T CM it , I R 9 Pl ni , a l MARYv etaI, ( ) BAKER, . . 11 1 2 13
14 l5
16
) )
) )
39 V3-C(P) :- - RJ C 0C 9 V ORDER
) ) )
Dfnat e dn. es
Bef r t e Coud i t e Repor and Rec m m endaton oft e U nied St t s M agi tat oe h sh t o i h t ae sr e
Judge ( 58)(Recom mendaton' ent r d on November23,2009,i whih t e Magitat #d i i ' ee ) n ch sr e
Judge r c m m ends t att i Cour ent r an or er gr ntng pl i t fs m oton f r v l n ar eo h hs le d ai an i' f i o ou t y
dimisal acin ( 55) Noobectont t e Repor and Rec mmendatonhasbeenfld. s s of to # . j i oh t o i i e
17
1 Dl cussl N .s o
1 8 1 9 20
Thi Cour ' ay a c p , rj c,or modf, i whoe or i p d,t e s dig or s t' m c e t ee t in y l n a h n ns r c mmendatonsmadebyt emagitat .28U. , ,j636( )1) Furher under28 U. . . eo i h sr e ' ' SC b( . t , SC j 6 6 b)1 ,fa p ry mak sa t el obecin t t e magita ej d e' r c mmen ain, 3 ( ( )i at e i y jt oh m o sr t u g s e o dt o
t ent i Cour i r quied t ' ak a de novodet r iatonoft ose porinsoft e (epor h hs ts e r o ' e m emn i h t o hr t and r commendaton)t whih obecin i made.l Neverhels ,t e st t t does not e i o c j to s ' t e s h au e dequiel)s me Isserr viw by(hi Courqwhen no obecinsar fld. Thomasv.Ar , droe r ee ts t j to ei ' e' n 474 U. . 149-50( 985) Isead, S 140, 1 . n t undertestt t ,hi Cour i notr quiedt conduc h a ue t s ts e r o t ' nyr viw ataI... anyis e t ati n tt esubectofanobecin.L=. 1 9.Si iary, ' ee a I of s u h s o h j j to 'd at 4 ml l
t e Ni t Cicui has r cognied t ata dititcoud i notr quied t r vi w a magitat h nh r t e zh s rc s e r oe e sr e
21
22
23 24
25 26
27
28
iForanobj cint betmel, parymus ser eandfl iwihi 10daysaferbeig e to o i y a t tv i t tn e t n sered wiht e magitat j dge' r pod and r commendat n.2 U...j6 6()1( ) v th sr e u s e e i 8 sc 3 b()C . o
l
1 j dge' r por and r commendatonwher noobecinshave beenfld.See Unied St t s u se t e i e j to i e t ae
2 v Re n - a i , 8F. d1 1 ( t Ci. 00 ) ds e a digt esa d r o r viw emply d . y a - pa 32 3 1 4 9 h r 2 3 ( ir g r n h t n a d f e e r oe
3 byt edititcourwhenr viwigar podandr commendatont whihnoobjctonswer h src t ee n e e io c ei e 4 madel see alo Schmitv.J hnst ne, F. upp. 1 1 ,1 26 ( . i . ; s d o o 263 s 2d 2 9 2 D Arz 2003)(eadig rn
5 t e Ni t C icui' deci i n i Reyna-r pi as adoptng t e vi w t atdi t i tc uds ar not h n h r ts so n -a a iheh s rc o e
6 r quied t r viw d ny is e t ati nott e subjctofan objcton.) Thus,i t er i no e r o e e ' su h s a h e e i '. ' fh e s
7 objcton t a magitat jdge' r c m mendaton, t en t i Cour may acc pt t e ei o sr e u s e o i h hs t eh 8 r commendaton wihoutr viw. Seee, . Johnst ne,263 F. upp. at1 26 ( cc ptng, e it ee n, o s 2d 2 a e i 9 wihoutr viw , magitat jdge' r commendatont whihnoobjctonwasfld) t ee a sr e u s e io c ei i. e 1 0 I t i c se,def ndantfld a notce ofnon- pposii n t te moton ( 56)and no n hs a e i e i o to o h i# 11 obectont t eMagitat Judge' Reporand Rec mmendaton.Alhoughnoobectonwas j i oh sr e s t o i t ji 1 fl d,t i Coud has r viwed t e Repor and Rec mmendaton ( 58) and acc pt i, 2 i hs e ee h t o i#, est
13 Accor i gl , dn y
1 4 I I HEREBY ORDERED t atPlitfsMotonf rVolnt r dimisal Acin( 55) TS h a ni ' i o u a y s s of to # f 1 i GRANTED.The Clr oft e Coud shalent rjdgmentaccor igl. 5s ek h l eu dn y
1 6
1 7
1 8 19
.
I I SO O RDERED. TS
DATED:Thi 2nd day of Febr ar , s u y 2010.
20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Rober C.Jon s t U NI ED STA S DI TR I T JUDGE T SC
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?