Van Nort v. Fair et al

Filing 9

ORDER: Thirty days have passed and P has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's 7 order. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. FURTHER ORD Clerk shall enter judgment for Ds and to close this case. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/13/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff, an inmate at Northern Nevada Correctional Center, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. On May 20, 2009, the court entered a screening order in this case (Docket #7). In that order, the court granted plaintiff thirty days within which to file an amended complaint, remedying, if possible, the defects in the original complaint. Plaintiff was expressly informed that his failure to timely file an amended complaint in compliance with the court's order would result in the dismissal of this action and the entry of judgment for defendants. Thirty days have now passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk is directed to enter judgment for defendants and to close this case. DATED this 13th day of July, 2009. vs GLEN FAIR, et al., Defendants. SCOTTIE RAY VAN NORT, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:09-cv-00059-LRH-VPC ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?