Erickson v. Benedetti, et al

Filing 23

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. A certificate of appealability is denied. FURTHER ORDERED, all pending motions ( 15 & 20 ) are DENIED without prejudice as moot. Respondents need not file the additional exhibits that are the subject of the extension 20 motion. The Clerk shall enter final judgment accordingly, dismissing this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/14/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)

Download PDF
Erickson v. Benedetti, et al Doc. 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 vs. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _________________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Court mail sent to the last institutional address given by petitioner has been returned with a notation that petitioner has been paroled and no longer is in custody at the institution. As petitioner has failed to comply with Local Rule LSR 2-2, which requires him to immediately file a written notification of any change in address, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. A certificate of appealability is denied. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that all pending motions (## 15 & 20) are DENIED without prejudice as moot. Respondents need not file the additional exhibits that are the subject of the extension motion (#20). The Clerk shall enter final judgment accordingly, dismissing this action without prejudice. DATED this 14th day of July, 2010. JIM BENEDETTI, et al., Respondents. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RYATT DALE ERICKSON, Petitioner, 3:09-cv-00085-LRH-VPC ORDER Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?