Collins v. Northern Nevada Correctional Center Prison Authorities and Employees

Filing 3

ORDER that the Clk shall send P a blank application form for an application to proceed in forma pauperis for incarcerated litigants and a blank civil rights cmp form with instructions. The Clk shall also return a cpy of P's submission to him. Sent all docs to P on 3/16/2009. FURTHER ORD that the action is DISMISSED w/o prejudice. If the P is attempting to initiate new claims, he must file a new action in which he either pays the $350.00 filing fee in full or submits a complete Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, accompanied by a properly executed financial certificate and a cpy of his inmate trust acct statement, and a cmp on the proper forms. If the P wishes to refile his sub mission in his existing case, he must resubmit it with the appropriate case number on it. FURTHER ORD that the Clk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Brian E. Sandoval on 3/12/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KL)

Download PDF
> ---- - .- . ft? l l 'i!i D i b. L l7 a . C0 l - -'L ptrj - - ' t-? L x) ( Q'E Q ECR 7 ' . FtX D -. 7t ' 5 tks y@ j . , - t.y.. ' j. I;q (j l r . l 2 %h: . f k i l ! ) gs t tt ;T ;' L) . 5 B - - - -- ' ' .. -. 3 4 5 y,.r j qu g rg s.ltk. ; Poiy tltw ' ' ,A Tl . .' . t i l A- J o ' . . r - . , , c> > - 6 7 8 UNI ED STATES DI TRI T CO URT T S C D I TR I T O F N EV A D A S C M EL I J. CO LLI S , VN N 9 Pl i tf, a n if l 0 VS . C ase No.3: 9- v- 1I - E S - P C 0 c 0 8B V ll NO RTHE RN NEVADA CORRECTI NA L O 1 CENTER PRI O N AUTHO RI I S AND 2 S TE EM PLO Y EES , 13 O R DE R D ef ndant . e s 14 1 5 Pl i tf, a n if who i i t e cust dyof he Nevada Deparm entofCorectons,hassubm i ed snh o t t ri t t 1 a doc men en ie d er an n Ij nci n'( oc e #1 . l i u cearwhe herPlit fi 6 u t t ld p m e t n u t ' D k t ) t s n l t o t ani s f 1 at m p ig t iia ea cvir h sac in pu s an t 42 U. . . 1 83ormak amot n i hs 7 te tn o nt t i li t t i g o ru to SC j 9 e i ni o 1 pendi g ci i rght ac i n,Coli s v Sanchez,3: 8- v- 1I - ES- PC . I t e eventt at 8 n v l i s to l. n 0 c 0 4B V nh h 1 Pl itf i atem ptng t com m ence a new acton,he has notpai t e $350. 0 fl g f e and 9 a n if s t io i dh 0 ii e n 20 has notsubm it d an Appl aton t Pr ceed i For a Paupers as r quied by 28 U. . . te ii o o c n m i er SC 21 j1 1 ( )1 an Lo a Rue L R 1 1 an 12. Th Lo alRue f dh rr qui t a t e 9 5 a ( ) d c l ls S - d ec ls u e e r h t h e 22 appl aton and com pl i tbe made on t e f r s pr vi ed by t i Coud. LSR 1 1,1 2,1- , ii c an h om od hs -4 23 and 2- . 1 24 I I THEREFO R E O RD ERE D t att e Cl r oft e Coud shal send Pl i tf a bl nk TS hh ek h l a n if a 25 appl aton f r f ran appl aton t pr ceed i f r a paupers f ri car er t d I i ant and i i om o c iioo c n om i o n c a e ig s t 26 // / 27 * l a bl nk ci irght com pl i tf r w ih i stuctons. The Cl r oft e Coud shalal o r t r a vl i s an om t n r i ek h l s e un 2 a copy of Pl i t fs subm i si n t hi . ani f so o m 3 I I FURTHER ORDERED t att e ac in i DI M I SED wi ou prj die. I t e TS hh t sSS o t t eu c f h h 4 Pl itl i atem ptng t i ii t new cl i s,he m us fl a new acton i w hi h he eiherpays ani s t i o n ta e am ti e in c t 5 t e $350. 0 fl g f e i f lorsubm is a com pl t Appl aton t Pr ceed i For a Pau ers, h 0 in e n u l i t ee ii o o c nm pi 6 accom pani d by a pr pery execut d fnanci lcediiat and a copy of hi i m at tust e ol ei a fc e sn er 7 accountst t m ent and a com pl iton t e pr perf r s. I t e pl i tf wi hes t r fl hi ae , an ho om f h a n if s o ei s e 8 subm i si n i hi exitng case,he m ustr subm i i wih t e appr prat case num beron i. s o n s si e tt t h o ie t 9 11 12 l3 14 I I FURTHER ORDERED t at t e Clr of t e Coud shal ent r j dgment TS hh ek h l eu DATED :t i 12t day ofM ar h, 2009. hs b c 1 acc r i gl . 0 o dn y UN 15 16 17 18 19 20 STATES DI TR I T JUDGE SC 2l 22 23 24 25 26 27 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?