v. Wilson
Filing
98
ORDERED that our Order (# 88 ), requiring the filing of a pre-trial order, is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that D's motions, styled as "petitions" (## 96 and 97 ) are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgm ent in favor of P and against D, in accordance with our Order (# 54 ), finding D liable for trespass, our Order (# 79 ), granting P's motion for permanent injunction, and the Permanent Injunction (# 80 ). Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 7/28/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
USA v. Wilson
Doc. 98
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RENO, NEVADA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) DALTON WILSON, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________) PRESENT: Deputy Clerk: EDWARD C. REED, JR. COLLEEN LARSEN Reporter: 3:09-CV-166-ECR-RAM MINUTES OF THE COURT DATE: July 28, 2010
U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE NONE APPEARING
Counsel for Plaintiff(s) Counsel for Defendant(s) MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS
NONE APPEARING NONE APPEARING
Plaintiff has filed a request (#95) that we vacate our Order (#88) directing the parties to file a joint pretrial order. Plaintiff no longer intends to seek damages against Defendant; as such, no issues remain in this case for trial. Defendant, in the meantime, continues to file documents (## 96 and 97) that repeat arguments previously rejected by the Court. IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED that our Order (#88), requiring the filing of a pre-trial order, is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's motions, styled as "petitions" (## 96 and 97) are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant, in accordance with our Order (#54), finding Defendant liable for trespass, our Order (#79), granting Plaintiff's motion for permanent injunction, and the Permanent Injunction (#80). LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK By /s/ Deputy Clerk
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?