v. Wilson

Filing 98

ORDERED that our Order (# 88 ), requiring the filing of a pre-trial order, is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that D's motions, styled as "petitions" (## 96 and 97 ) are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgm ent in favor of P and against D, in accordance with our Order (# 54 ), finding D liable for trespass, our Order (# 79 ), granting P's motion for permanent injunction, and the Permanent Injunction (# 80 ). Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 7/28/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

USA v. Wilson

Doc. 98

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RENO, NEVADA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) DALTON WILSON, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________) PRESENT: Deputy Clerk: EDWARD C. REED, JR. COLLEEN LARSEN Reporter: 3:09-CV-166-ECR-RAM MINUTES OF THE COURT DATE: July 28, 2010

U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE NONE APPEARING

Counsel for Plaintiff(s) Counsel for Defendant(s) MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS

NONE APPEARING NONE APPEARING

Plaintiff has filed a request (#95) that we vacate our Order (#88) directing the parties to file a joint pretrial order. Plaintiff no longer intends to seek damages against Defendant; as such, no issues remain in this case for trial. Defendant, in the meantime, continues to file documents (## 96 and 97) that repeat arguments previously rejected by the Court. IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED that our Order (#88), requiring the filing of a pre-trial order, is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's motions, styled as "petitions" (## 96 and 97) are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant, in accordance with our Order (#54), finding Defendant liable for trespass, our Order (#79), granting Plaintiff's motion for permanent injunction, and the Permanent Injunction (#80). LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK By /s/ Deputy Clerk

Dockets.Justia.com