Churchill County et al v. Bureau of Reclamation et al
Filing 61
ORDER. (COPY of Order #1187 in 3:73-cv-00003). The Court clarifies that the Order of 04/02/2009 in Case 3:73-cv-00003-LDG did not dismiss plaintiffs action but rather allowed plaintiffs to file an amended complaint as a new action that relates back to the filing date of the original complaint. Accordingly, the complaint filed in 3:09-cv-170-LDG (D.Nev.) Is deemed to have been filed on 03/04/2009. The clerk is directed to file a copy of this Order in 3:09-cv-170-LDG (D.Nev.). (ACKD). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 2/14/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
