Nika v. McDaniel et al
Filing
225
ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulation of the parties (ECF No. 223 ) is APPROVED. The time for Respondents to comply with the judgment is extended. Respondents will have until and including April 19, 2024, to eith er vacate Petitioner's death sentence and impose upon him a non-capital sentence consistent with law or file a notice of the State's intent to grant Petitioner a new penalty-phase trial, and the Respondents will have until and including August 9, 2024, to commence jury selection in a new penalty-phase trial. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/18/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
AVRAM VINETO NIKA,
Case No. 3:09-cv-00178-JCM-WGC
Petitioner,
ORDER
v.
WILLIAM GITTERE, et al.,
Respondents.
12
13
In this capital habeas corpus action, on June 12, 2019, the Court granted, in part,
14
Avram Vineto Nika’s habeas petition, and judgment was entered accordingly. See Order
15
entered June 12, 2019 (ECF No. 186); Judgment (ECF No. 187). The Court granted
16
Nika relief relative to the penalty phase of his trial. See id. Nika filed a motion to alter or
17
amend the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) (ECF No. 189), and
18
the Court granted that motion, in part, and expanded the certificate of appealability. See
19
Order entered October 4, 2019 (ECF No. 200); Amended Judgment (ECF No. 201).
20
The Court’s Amended Judgment stated, in part:
21
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Respondents
shall either (1) within 60 days from the date of this order, vacate
Petitioner’s death sentence and impose upon him a non-capital sentence,
consistent with law, or (2) within 60 days from the date of this order, file a
notice of the State’s intent to grant Petitioner a new penalty-phase trial,
and, within 180 days from the date of this order, commence jury selection
in the new penalty-phase trial.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
*
*
*
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment in
this action will be stayed pending the conclusion of any appellate or
certiorari review in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals or the United States
Supreme Court, or the expiration of the time for seeking such appellate or
certiorari review, whichever occurs later.
1
1
2
Amended Judgment (ECF No. 201).
The respondents did not appeal. Nika, however, did appeal the denial of relief on
3
certain of his claims. On September 15, 2022, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
4
affirmed. See Memorandum (ECF No. 206). On December 20, 2022, the Court of
5
Appeals denied panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. See Order entered
6
December 20, 2022 (ECF No. 208).
7
Nika then had until March 20, 2023, to file a petition for writ of certiorari before
8
the United States Supreme Court (see U.S. Sup. Ct. R. 13) but did not file a petition for
9
writ of certiorari.
10
Therefore, the time for Respondents to comply with the judgment began running
11
on March 20, 2023. Respondents then had 60 days—until May 19, 2023—to either
12
vacate Petitioner’s death sentence and impose upon him a non-capital sentence
13
consistent with law or file a notice of the State’s intent to grant Petitioner a new penalty-
14
phase trial. And, Respondents then had 180 days—until September 16, 2023—to
15
commence jury selection in a new penalty-phase trial.
16
On May 16, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation (ECF Nos. 211, 213 (corrected
17
stipulation), 215 (further corrected stipulation)), agreeing to extend by 60 days the time
18
for Respondents to comply with the judgment. The parties stated in that stipulation that
19
they, along with the Washoe County District Attorney’s Office, were in discussions
20
regarding potential resolution of the case, but they required more time to complete
21
those discussions. The Court found that there was good cause for the extension of time
22
requested by the parties and approved the stipulation on May 19, 2023, extending the
23
time for compliance with the amended judgment (ECF No. 216).
24
On July 18, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation (ECF Nos. 217, 219 (corrected
25
stipulation)) requesting a second extension of the time, of 30 days, for compliance with
26
the judgment. The parties stated in the stipulation that they, and the Washoe County
27
District Attorney’s Office, were still in discussions concerning potential resolution of the
28
case and that they required an additional 30 days to complete the discussions. The
2
1
Court approved that second stipulated extension of time (ECF No. 220). Respondents
2
then had until August 17, 2023, to either vacate Petitioner’s death sentence and impose
3
upon him a non-capital sentence consistent with law or file a notice of the State’s intent
4
to grant Petitioner a new penalty-phase trial, and the Respondents then had until
5
December 15, 2023, to commence jury selection in a new penalty-phase trial.
6
On August 17, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation (ECF No. 221) requesting a
7
third extension of the time, of 120 days, for compliance with the judgment. The parties
8
stated in the stipulation that they, along with the Washoe County District Attorney’s
9
Office, were still in discussions concerning potential resolution of the case and that
10
counsel had not yet been appointed for Nika for a new penalty phase trial, and that they
11
needed more time “[i]n order to provide the prosecution and any future-appointed
12
defense counsel an opportunity to continue negotiations and/or to hold a new
13
sentencing or penalty hearing.” Stipulation (ECF No. 221) at 2. The Court approved that
14
extension of time (ECF No. 222). Respondents then had until December 15, 2023, to
15
either vacate Petitioner’s death sentence and impose upon him a non-capital sentence
16
consistent with law or file a notice of the State’s intent to grant Petitioner a new penalty-
17
phase trial, and the Respondents then had until April 5, 2024, to commence jury
18
selection in a new penalty-phase trial.
19
On December 12, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation (ECF No. 223) requesting a
20
fourth extension of the time, of 120 days, for compliance with the judgment. The parties
21
state in the stipulation that they, along with the Washoe County District Attorney’s
22
Office, are still in discussions concerning potential resolution of the case, and that
23
counsel has now been appointed for Nika for a new penalty phase trial. Stipulation (ECF
24
No. 223) at 2. The parties continue: “Given the recent appointment of new counsel,
25
pending negotiations, and either entry of the new sentence or a decision to pursue a
26
new penalty hearing, the parties ask this Court to extend the judgment deadline by one-
27
hundred twenty-six (126) days.” Id. at 3.
28
3
1
IT IS THEREFORE HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulation of the parties
2
(ECF No. 223) is APPROVED. The time for Respondents to comply with the
3
judgment is extended. Respondents will have until and including April 19, 2024, to
4
either vacate Petitioner’s death sentence and impose upon him a non-capital sentence
5
consistent with law or file a notice of the State’s intent to grant Petitioner a new penalty-
6
phase trial, and the Respondents will have until and including August 9, 2024, to
7
commence jury selection in a new penalty-phase trial.
8
9
December
18,of
2023.
DATED THIS
___ day
______________________, 2023.
10
11
12
JAMES C. MAHAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?