Sales Service Company v. Van Over et al

Filing 9

ORDER granting 8 Defendants Van Over's EX PARTE MOTION for an extension of time to file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint and obtain Reno counsel. (Answer due by 5/17/2009.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/27/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)

1

2

DA V I V A N O V E R D I P R O PER N 200 So t V igi i St e t Suie 8 0 u h r n a r e, t û R e o, e a a 89501 n N vd

FIED L
ENTEIE: q

RECEIE V D sEw Eo ON f G I S EFR I û R I D CJ E I TB F EI N

3
4

Tcl ( 75 56 - 888 :7 ) 2 3
I pr pe Def nda t n o r e ns

IFF 2 7 ;) j 'I ?0 (

s
6
7 8 9

oAvl c. ovkR Axo o vAx vAx ovl coRpon -l x m ro
B: Y

CEITsnsF!Tc uy LR UClT qAo R DSR TOR KI
DE U Y PT

U N I ED STATES D I TR I T C O U R T T S C FO R THE D I T R I T OF N EV A D A SC

1 0 11 1 2 1 3 1 4 15 1 6
17 18 19 20

) ) Pli tf, anif ) ) v. ) ) DAVI VAN OVER;VAN OVER D ) CORPORATI N ST. O> PAUL FI E AND ) R M ARI E I SURANCE COM PANY DBA ) NN TM VELERS I SURANCE COMPANY') N , DOES 1 1 0pa dBLACK AND W HI E ) -0 ' n T OCMPANI S 1 1200, E 0) ) Dee da t. fn ns ) )

SALESSERVI E COM PANY, C

Ca eNo.3:9- V- 021 - RH- PC s : 0 C 0 0L V DEFENDANT DAVI VAN D OVERS AND VAN OVER S CORPOM TI N' EX PAR T OS E APPLI A TI N W K EXTENSI N CO O OF TI E I W HI H TO MN C RESPOND TO COM PLAI T; N I ROPO SEDIORDER P L. . 1;6R 6- 2

D ef nda t D a i va O ve a d V a Ove Co po a i n he e y r q es a 20 da e ns vd n rn n r r r to r b e u t - y e t ns o oftm e i whi h t fl a r s ons t pl i tf ' c m pl i t x e in i n c o ie e p e o a n if s o a n . D e e da tV a O verCom or ton ha c uns li Ca i or i t a i a r a y pur ui g fn n n ai s o e n lf n a h t s le d sn

21
22 23

r l td ltgai n i vol i g t es m eca go a d i s r nc pr c eds The def nda t do not e ae ii to n v n h a r n nu a e o e e ns , h ow e e ,ha e c uns li Re o. The ne d a le t ns on oftm e s t a t e c n fnd Re o vr v o e n n y e r xe i i o h th y a i n
.

c t s lt m a et ea pr prae a pe r nce i t i co r or i unabl t tnd c t s l s om e o k h p o it p aa s n h s u t ,f e o i o m e, o
t a t e m a a pea r r s . h th y y p r o e ///

24
?) (

a 7vl .eIîso 25 X èx1vEr )) t. st ù roèTt.i :( r ,)3 e , rl9g !5 : : .j ,s

/// y/y ,
///

27 28

-

1-

caeNo. 09CV-0 l-RH- P s 3: - 0 2 0L V C

E PART AP LI ATI N F R E TENS ON OFTI E TO FLE RESP NS X E PC O O X I M I OE

'

4

A

1 2

Thi i t e tr te t ns o s ught O ve t epa tw e k, f nda t 'Ca ior i s s h is xe in o . r h s e de e n s lf n a c t s lhason s ve a oc a i nsr que t d abr e e t ns on oftm e f om pl i tf s om e e r l c so e se if x e i ir a n ip

3
4
5 6

c uns l e pli i g t a defnda t do notha e c uns li N e a a.Pl i tf hasr f s d t o e, x a n n h t e n s v o e n vd an if eue o
p a ta e t ns o . Def nda t 'r s ons i due t da , prl27,2009. n n x e in e ns ep e s o yA i

D at d: Apri 27,2009 e l

7

8
p

DA V I V A N O V ER D I pr pe f r D e e da t , n o ro fn n s D A V I C . A N O V ER A N D DV vAN ovER coRp . TI N o
,. ,' '
' .
.

;

/
* < .

)

1 0
11

By: . 6 '2
D avi va Ove dn r

,J , >

12 13 14 15 16
17

I I SO ORD ER ED : TS

U N I ED STATES D I T R I T J D G E T S CU
__________________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
D at d: e DATED: April 27, 2009

18

1 9
20 2l 22

23
24
z

l vu:loae llk; lR. o , ,e t
.

25

1o,J.I2 sLx 1 Ti7T2 6 . a.l w3
27 28
-

2-

CaeNo 3:9CV-0 1 -RH- P s . 0 - 0 2 0L V C

EX PARTE APPI ATI N FOR EXTENSI N OF TI E TO FI E RESPONSE X O O M L