AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE et al v. THE STATE OF NEVADA ex rel its Department of Corrections et al
ORDER re 36 Objection, which the court will treat as an opposition, to 35 Magistrate's Order. The court having conducted its review and fully considered plaintiff's opposition, and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C . Sec. 636(b)(1), concludes that the Magistrate Judge's ruling was neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. The Magistrate Judge's order 35 will, therefore, be sustained. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/24/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ***** AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, ) COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ) 3:09-cv-00235-LRH-RAM LOCAL 4041, et al., ) ) ORDER Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) THE STATE OF NEVADA, ex rel, its ) Department of Corrections, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) Before the court is Plaintiff's Objection (#361) to Magistrate Judge Cooke's October 21, 2009, ruling with regard to Show Cause Hearing re sanctions, which the court will treat as an opposition to the Magistrate's Order (#35). The Court has conducted its review in this case, has fully considered the Plaintiff's opposition, and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1), and concludes that the Magistrate Judge's ruling was neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. The Magistrate Judge's Order (#35) will, therefore, be sustained. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 24th day of February, 2010.
LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Refers to this court's docket number.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?